▼

tiistai 26. tammikuuta 2021

Why Do Socialists Promote Global Warming?

  • Fourteen Is the New Fifteen (14='15') - the Climategate Scandal #ClimateHoax Who collects all the world's carbon taxes in their own coffers?
  • The World Bank - IMF is owned and controlled by NM Rothschild and 30 to 40 of the wealthiest people in the world.
  • "As soon as a coin in the coffer rings, a soul from purgatory springs" Perpetual everyday plenary indulgence: Goyims calculates their carbon footprint and pays for it. Short periods so you don't collect too much debt.
  • Carbon foot print calculators for goyims.


Why Do Socialists Promote Global Warming?

Andrew Anglin January 26, 2021




Someone must have wondered at some point what forcing people to pay taxes and stop driving and eating meat based on a completely fantastical theory that it will change the weather has to do with “the workers.”

In actual reality, global warming is a series of taxes designed specifically to gut the working and middle classes. And yet, we find that everyone who believes in socialism appears to believe in global warming.


Why?

This is an interesting question on its face, but it’s also interesting in relation to the conservative belief that being dominated by international corporations that decide what you can say and think is “freedom.” Because when you ask “why would people who support the worker support impoverishing him?” you would also ask “why would people who value self-reliance and small businesses support mega-corporations dominating society?”

You could go into something about how leftists know that in order for their programs to work, everyone has to be poor, so they actually want to purposefully make people poor. That is true for the big thinking leftists, but they are a fraction of the leftist population (virtually every intellectual involved in politics is either on the right or is a Jewish liar promoting utopian gibberish).

The first explanation would be “because everything is a bunch of bullshit.” But that’s a little bit too easy.

The second explanation is that mother earth worship is feminine, and the left tends to be feminine, while the right is masculine. That’s something obvious that we talk about on here a lot, but somehow when Paul Gottfried asked the question about what he called “belief clusters,” he didn’t bother to note the obvious masculine/feminine dichotomy of modern politics.

So I guess I should take a minute to elaborate on why this is.

Men tend to prize independence, whereas women prefer collectivism and central authority.

This is because every man is a leader, to some extent, in that he leads his own family. So even when a man is a part of a hierarchy, where he is on the lower rank of it, he still values independence, naturally. A man who is a leader of other men recognizes that they are all leaders in their own homes, and he respects that, and speaks to the lower members of his hierarchy in the same tone of voice, and using the same words, as he speaks to the higher members. A man understands a man being in authority over him, because he is an authority in his household, and so a lower member of a hierarchy respects the decisions of the higher members as he hopes his wife and children will respect his own decisions.

Women, on the other hand, are not naturally leaders, so when they get together in a group, they do things by consensus opinion. They are also cruel and vindictive with other women, and do not value responsibility and fairness or clearly thought-through arguments. Everything is about their feelings. Instead of nodding and getting down to business, women continually give each other false compliments, and talk in circles about gibberish in order to express the fact that they approve of each other as part of a collective. You can see this in the film “Mean Girls,” which I always recommend everyone watch in order to better understand women (it is one of the very few honest portrayals in film).

At least according to what we’re being told, a full 80% of white men voted for Donald Trump over Joe Biden, while the number of white women is being given as 55%. The women who did vote for Trump, you would find, are women who are married and/or have a strong relationship with their fathers. They view Trump as an extension of that male authority.

The coronavirus was the main issue of the election, and that was a pure masculine/feminine dichotomy, with the male view being that people should be allowed to make their own choices and that we can’t overturn the entire order of rights in society, and the female view being that the government is your mommy and the Constitution is just a piece of paper like any other.

Obviously, men are also more likely to look into the actual data surrounding this flu, and find that it’s all a hoax, while the women get drawn into the emotional spectacle of it, and this whole “we’re all in it together” thing. Further, women will just generally listen to the media a lot more, because they view it as a public consensus announcement service, and it’s very important to them that they be in line with that consensus.

Understanding the differences between men and women, you can understand why right is male brained and left is female brained. If it’s taking a minute to recognize where global warming fits into that: just look at all of the women that get involved in the occult, palm reading, fortune telling, and so on. Spiritualism in general is typically feminine, and various spirit cults are the only place anywhere in history before the 20th century where you are going to find women in charge. Global warming is a kind of mother earth nonsense occult belief. “Listening to the planet” is a phrase you repeatedly hear with these people. A man’s response would be “I’m listening, woman, and it ain’t talking – it’s dirt and rocks and it doesn’t have a mouth.”

Meanwhile, “the government doesn’t have any right to tell anybody what to do” is something that appeals to masculine sensibilities.

However, here’s the thing: “driving cars and eating meat is changing the weather” and “multinational corporations shouldn’t be regulated by the government at all” are both very, very specific and specifically weird beliefs.

Leftists could just as easily be promoting open wizardry and occultism with ghosts and Ouija boards, and say the world was going to end because we weren’t allowing women to “free bleed” during menstruation, which was causing a blockage in the spiritual energies of the universe, and have the global goal of ridding the world of tampons before dark spirts suck us all into a tube in the sky. Instead, it’s the weather thing, and the solution is taxes on the middle class and forcing everyone to eat bugs.

Rightists could just as easily be demanding child marriage and an end to women being schooled or taught to read. The entire education system could easily be a target for right-wingers, and they could be saying “girls should be getting ready for marriage, and boys should be put to work.” Instead, they focused specifically on promoting the idea that wealthy people should be able to act without any kind of regulations, allowing a tiny elite minority to suck up all the wealth and dominate society completely.

The explanations for both things is that there is an agenda behind everything, and democracy allows for a seemingly counterintuitive progression of society.

If you were a group who was planning the future, and you envisioned a situation where the middle class was abolished, people were stripped of their basic rights, and a tiny elite minority ruled over everyone and forced them to eat bugs, you would have a very hard time selling people on that. The peasants have always had some form of rights, going back to the Middle Ages.
And even during the Industrial Revolution, we started to develop the idea of social mobility. Having freedom and economic prosperity are typically things that both the right and left would agree are universally good in nature.

So what they did was create “rider” agendas to attach to both right and left, that the democracy process could itself be used to explain.

A “rider” is what they call a totally different topic that gets attached to a bill in Congress. Like if the bill is about spending for roads, it includes a passage about how Israel gets more access to our intelligence. It’s often the way they push through things that wouldn’t otherwise be popular.

People generally sign up for one thing or the other. If somebody says A, B, C and D, and you really feel strongly about A, B and C, you’re going to go along with D without thinking too much about it, generally. If right-wingers started thinking about the fallout of free trade, they’ll get the whole spiel about regulations progressing toward communism. Left-wingers are obviously less likely to ask questions, but if they do wonder what eating bugs has to do with “the workers,” they’re shown the hockey stick graph which says if we don’t eat bugs, we’re all going to burn up.

When leftists went to the government and asked why we were allowing corporations to run wild, why they were refusing to tax the ultra rich, why they were allowing Walmart to destroy small towns, the government could point to libertarians, who would say “we have to do this for the sake of independence and fairness.”

Right-wingers supported this because these same people were supporting everything else they supported, and the idea that “Walmart destroyed your town square because it delivers better value” was acceptable to them in the larger context of the agenda they were presenting.
These people were lied to and apparently believed there was no way to categorize small businesses differently than large corporations, legally, and if Walmart wasn’t allowed to destroy towns, it would mean that the government would have to implement a planned economy, as under communism. (“And then it will be communism” is kind of a right-wing equivalent of the leftist doomsday claims about the weather.)

Right-wingers are now in a kind of shock seeing this shutdown on freedom of speech, but the government can simply say: “this is what you wanted.”

Obviously, this whole global warming thing is going to come back and bite leftists the same way. We’ve already seen articles saying that people who support climate change theories are still going on vacations and refusing to eat bugs. Just like there was a fringe vanguard cult of libertarians who were tasked with injecting that agenda into conservatism, there is a fringe cult of climate changers who are going to start pushing these people to “practice what they preach.” Most of them won’t do it.

Then, at some point, they will realize they don’t have a choice.

Right-wingers were told: “No, you don’t have freedom of speech anymore, because you gave your speech rights to private companies as part of a bizarre deregulation agenda presented by fringe kooks. Yes, the end result is a lot like the communism you were trying to avoid, but the difference is that in this case, the government is – oh, it doesn’t matter anymore. It’s already happened and there is nothing that you can do about it.”

It will be the same for any leftist who wakes up and realizes that he didn’t get an anarcho-syndicalist utopia.

Democracy is about pitting people against each other, using nonsense and psychological and emotional exploitation, to push through a pre-determined agenda, and then pretend it was an accident.

https://dailystormer.su/why-do-socialists-promote-global-warming/


Graviola Finland
Scientists Dishonest And Afraid
Tony Heller has exposed some of the egregious dishonesty of mainstream environmentalists in a video he's titled: - "My Gift To Climate Alarmists."



https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/11/scientists-dishonest-and-afraid.html


Graviola Finland‏ 
Fourteen Is the New Fifteen (14='15') - the Climategate Scandal #ClimateHoax -Average temperature over past 10,000 years is 15°C. -In literature after the 1997 report by @Worldwatch , the leaders of the global warming movement have started using 14 degrees
https://web.archive.org/web/20210126201739/https://twitter.com/GraviolaDOTfi/status/1319911820782673920?s=20


__
eof

klo Ei kommentteja:

torstai 21. tammikuuta 2021

WHO inspector caught on camera revealing coronavirus manipulation in Wuhan before pandemic

  • SARS-CoV-2 is a chimera made in a lab, inserting the spike protein "into a backbone of another virus".
  • Daszak coordinated with Shi Zhengli, (石正麗), also known as "Bat Woman," at the WIV on investigating and cataloging bat coronaviruses across China.
  • Based on Peter Daszak's statements, it appears that just before the start of the pandemic, the WIV was using GoF experiments with chimeras in an attempt to create a vaccine - Video.


In light of the WHO's trip to Wuhan, a researcher who goes by the pseudonym Billy Bostickson and his colleagues at DRASTIC (Decentralized Radical Autonomous Search Team Investigating COVID-19) have created a petition demanding that the international investigation team answer 50 key questions about the outbreak in Wuhan. Among the questions is a request to access to the facility's database and laboratory records, which are supposed to go back 20 years and include a look at its safety procedures, safety audit reports, and safety incident reports.


WHO inspector caught on camera revealing coronavirus manipulation in Wuhan before pandemic

Vincent Racaniello (left), Peter Daszak (right).




Video shows scientist mention coronavirus experimentation in Wuhan lab weeks before pandemic.

Video taken just days before the start of the coronavirus pandemic shows a current World Health Organization (WHO) inspector discuss the testing of modified coronaviruses on human cells and humanized mice in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), just weeks before the first cases of COVID-19 were announced in the city of Wuhan itself.


In a video that was originally taken on Dec. 9, 2019, three weeks before the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission announced an outbreak of a new form of pneumonia, virologist Vincent Racaniello interviewed British zoologist and president of EcoHealth Alliance Peter Daszak about his work at the nonprofit to protect the world from the emergence of new diseases and predict pandemics.
Since 2014, Daszak's organization has received millions of dollars of funding from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), which it has funneled to the WIV to carry out research on bat coronaviruses.


In the first phase of research, which took place from 2014 to 2019, Daszak coordinated with Shi Zhengli, (石正麗), also known as "Bat Woman," at the WIV on investigating and cataloging bat coronaviruses across China. EcoHealth Alliance received US$3.7 million in funding from the NIH for this research and 10 percent was channeled to the WIV, reported NPR.

The second, more dangerous phase, which started in 2019, involved gain-of-function (GoF) research on coronaviruses and chimeras in humanized mice from the lab of Ralph S. Baric of the University of North Carolina. Funding for the program was withdrawn by the NIH under the Trump administration on April 27 amid the pandemic.

At the 28:10 mark of the podcast interview, Daszak states that researchers found that SARS likely originated from bats and then set out to find more SARS-related coronaviruses, eventually finding over 100.

He observed that some coronaviruses can "get into human cells in the lab," and others can cause SARS disease in "humanized mouse models."

He ominously warned that such coronaviruses are "untreatable with therapeutic monoclonals [antibodies] and you can’t vaccinate against them with a vaccine." Ironically, he claims that his team's goal was trying to find the next "spillover event" that could cause the next pandemic, mere weeks before cases of COVID-19 were beginning to be reported in Wuhan.

When Racaniello asks what can be done to deal with coronavirus given that there is no vaccine or therapeutic for them, Daszak at the 29:54 mark appears to reveal that the goal of the GoF experiments was to develop a pan-coronavirus vaccine for many different types of coronaviruses.


Based on his response, it is evident that just before the start of the pandemic, the WIV was modifying coronaviruses in the lab. "You can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily." What he then mentioned has become the telltale trait of SARS-CoV-2, its spike protein: "Spike protein drives a lot of what happens with the coronavirus, zoonotic risk."

Daszak mentions the WIV's collaboration with Baric: "and we work with Ralph Baric at UNC [University of North Carolina] to do this." As has been suggested by proponents that SARS-CoV-2 is a chimera made in a lab, he speaks of inserting the spike protein "into a backbone of another virus" and then doing "some work in the lab."


Providing evidence of the creation of chimeras for the sake of a vaccine, he states "Now, the logical progression for vaccines is, if you are going to develop a vaccine for SARS, people are going to use pandemic SARS, but let’s try to insert these other related diseases and get a better vaccine.”

Based on Daszak's statements, it appears that just before the start of the pandemic, the WIV was using GoF experiments with chimeras in an attempt to create a vaccine. These experiments appeared to have included infecting mice genetically modified to express the human ACE2 protein with these chimeras.


In a presentation titled "Assessing Coronavirus Threats," which was delivered four years before the pandemic in 2015, Daszak points out that experiments involving humanized mice have the highest degree of risk. Demonstrating his close ties with the WIV, he also listed the lab as a collaborator at the end of the presentation.

Controversially, Daszak has been included among a team of experts from the WHO that has finally been allowed by Beijing to investigate the origin of the outbreak of COVID-19, over a year after it started. Scientists such as Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University in New Jersey, are condemning Daszak's participation due to conflicts of interest "that unequivocally disqualify him from being part of an investigation of the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic," reported the Daily Mail.


In light of the WHO's trip to Wuhan, a researcher who goes by the pseudonym Billy Bostickson and his colleagues at DRASTIC (Decentralized Radical Autonomous Search Team Investigating COVID-19) have created a petition demanding that the international investigation team answer 50 key questions about the outbreak in Wuhan. Among the questions is a request to access to the facility's database and laboratory records, which are supposed to go back 20 years and include a look at its safety procedures, safety audit reports, and safety incident reports.


https://youtu.be/IdYDL_RK--w


___


Chimera (genetics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
This article is about genetic chimærism. For the cartilaginous fish, see Chimaera. For the mythological beast, see Chimera (mythology).
Two-colored rose chimera

A genetic chimerism or chimera (/kaɪˈmɪərə/ ky-MEER-ə or /kɪˈmɪərə/ kə-MEER-ə, also spelled chimaera or chimæra) is a single organism composed of cells with more than one distinct genotype. In animals, this means an individual derived from two or more zygotes, which can include possessing blood cells of different blood types, subtle variations in form (phenotype) and, if the zygotes were of differing sexes, then even the possession of both female and male sex organs[1] (this is just one of many different phenomena that may result in intersexuality). Animal chimeras are produced by the merger of multiple fertilized eggs. In plant chimeras, however, the distinct types of tissue may originate from the same zygote, and the difference is often due to mutation during ordinary cell division. Normally, genetic chimerism is not visible on casual inspection; however, it has been detected in the course of proving parentage.[2]

Another way that chimerism can occur in animals is by organ transplantation, giving one individual tissues that developed from a different genome. For example, transplantation of bone marrow often determines the recipient's ensuing blood type.


Viruses[edit]

Boiling Springs Lake, California, is where the first natural chimeric virus was found in 2012.[64]

In 2012, the first example of an RNA-DNA hybrid virus was unexpectedly discovered during a metagenomic study of the acidic extreme environment of Boiling Springs Lake that is in Lassen Volcanic National Park, California.[64][65] The virus was named BSL-RDHV (Boiling Spring Lake RNA DNA Hybrid Virus).[66]

Its genome is related to a DNA circovirus, which usually infect birds and pigs, and a RNA tombusvirus, which infect plants. The study surprised scientists, because DNA and RNA viruses vary and the way the chimera came together was not understood.[64][67] Other viral chimeras have also been found, and the group is known as the CHIV viruses ("chimeric viruses").[68]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_%28genetics%29
___

klo Ei kommentteja:

maanantai 18. tammikuuta 2021

Peruvian Court Probing Judge's Ruling Alleging Soros, Bill Gates are Creators of COVID-19 Pandemic

  • COVID-1984 FOI Request | UK Government Admits Virus Doesn’t Exist.
  • Freedom of Information reveals Public Health Agency of Canada has no record of #SARSCoV2” isolation performed by anyone, anywhere, ever.

Peruvian Court Probing Judge's Ruling Alleging Soros, Bill Gates are Creators of COVID-19 Pandemic


by 



Despite the World Health Organisation last year confirming the coronavirus to be of animal origin, conspiracy theories that COVID-19 is man-made continue to circulate.

The Supreme Court in the Ica region of Peru is investigating a resolution by a local court, claiming that COVID-19 was invented by the "criminal elites" of Hungarian-American philanthropist George Soros, the Rockefeller family, and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates.

We "have ordered a preliminary investigation into the Chief Justices of the Criminal Appeals Chamber Chincha and Pisco to obtain evidence that will help determine the presence or absence of alleged violations", the Ica Supreme Court said in a message published on its Facebook page.

The probe comes after the Chinch and Pisco court reportedly moved to justify a petition for an extension of pre-trial detention in one criminal case due to the unpredictable nature of the coronavirus pandemic created by the "criminal elites who dominate the world".

"No world government, natural and legal persons, nor the defendant's defence can maintain that this pandemic has the quality of [being] 'predictable', except for the creators of the new world order such as Bill Gates, Soros, Rockefeller and others, who handled it and continue to do so with extreme secrecy within their environments and global corporations", the court earlier argued.

George Soros (File)
© CC BY-SA 3.0 / NICCOLÒ CARANTI / GEORGE SOROS
Business Magnate George Soros to Contribute 1 Mln Euros to Hungary's Fight Against COVID-19
This comes amid ongoing conspiracy theories about the man-made origin of COVID-19, even though the World Health Organisation in May 2020 confirmed the virus was of animal origin.

The theories have been repeatedly fuelled by fake news claiming that Bill Gates or George Soros were promoters of a supposed plan to control the population via COVID-19 vaccines and 5G networks.

"[…] It's so easy to click on, particularly when a simple explanation for this pandemic—that there is somebody evil behind it—is somehow easier than the true biology, which is actually kind of complicated. So we have to make the truth more interesting. We've got to label things with the truth", Gates pointed out in an interview with Trevor Noah's "The Daily Show" in November 2020.

https://sputniknews.com/latam/202101121081739595-peruvian-court-probing-judges-ruling-alleging-soros-bill-gates-are-creators-of-covid-19-pandemic/

__


COVID-1984 FOI Request | UK Government Admits Virus Doesn’t Exist

29th October 2020

While preparing the court papers for the Private Criminal Prosecution of MPs for pandemic fraud, they have no records which show that the cause of the COVID 19 virus has ever been proven to exist.


/

https://tinyurl.com/y2o55qfn

https://www.thebernician.net/covid-1984-foi-request-uk-government-admits-virus-doesnt-exist


__


Freedom of Information reveals Public Health Agency of Canada has no record of "SARSCoV2” isolation performed by anyone, anywhere, ever

December 7, 2020





- Patty Hajdu

- Dr. Theresa Tam

- Iain Stewart, Council (NRC) of Canada

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/freedom-of-information-reveals-public-health-agency-of-canada-has-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-performed-by-anyone-anywhere-ever/

__

eof

klo Ei kommentteja:

tiistai 12. tammikuuta 2021

Gov propaganda and the PCR test fraud


  • WHO Finally Admits COVID19 PCR Test Has A ‘Problem’
  • In Brief: the PCR test and government fraud
  • Professor Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993.  ‘Coincidentally’, Mullis died just before the pandemic started.

Gov propaganda and the PCR test fraud


The government's entire case for its propaganda line, "Oh look at the scary way the virus is SPREADING!" is based on the notorious PCR test.

BUT THE PCR TEST IS USELESS FOR DETECTING THE PRESENCE OF A LIVE INFECTIOUS VIRUS. IT CANNOT DO THAT AND NEVER HAS.

This is not me say this .

This is, among many many other expert sources you should pay attention to:

THE World Health Organisation. Yes, the W.H.O. See this article below:


WHO Finally Admits COVID19 PCR Test Has A ‘Problem’

Published on 

Written by John O'Sullivan

In a statement released on December 14, 2020 the World Health Organization finally owned up to what 100,000’s of doctors and medical professionals have been saying for months: the PCR test used to diagnose COVID-19 is a hit and miss process with way too many false positives.

This  WHO-admitted “Problem” comes in the wake of international lawsuits exposing the incompetence and malfeasance of public health officials and policymakers for reliance on a diagnostic test not fit for purpose.

This World Health Organization admission is that the crux of the “problem” is a wholly arbitrary cycling process which “means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.”  [emphasis added]

The UN body is now clearly looking to distance itself from the fatally flawed test as a growing number of lawsuits are processing through the courts exposing the insanity of relying on a test that even the inventor, Professor Kary B. Mullis said was never designed to diagnose diseases. [1]

Professor Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993.  ‘Coincidentally’, Mullis died just before the pandemic started.

We reported on November 22, 2020 that a landmark court case in Portugal had ruled that the polymerase chain reaction test (PCR) used worldwide to diagnose COVID-19 was not fit for purpose.  Most importantly, the judges ruled that a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection.

As Off-Guardian.org reported at the time:

“In their ruling, judges Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés referred to several scientific studies. Most notably this study by Jaafar et al., which found that – when running PCR tests with 35 cycles or more – the accuracy dropped to 3%, meaning up to 97% of positive results could be false positives.

The ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science they read, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable. Governments and private labs have been very tight-lipped about the exact number of cycles they run when PCR testing, but it is known to sometimes be as high as 45. Even fearmonger-in-chief Anthony Fauci has publicly stated anything over 35 is totally unusable.”

You can read the complete ruling in the original Portuguese here, and translated into English here.

Among thousands of angry doctors arguing PCR tests should not be used is Dr. Pascal Sacré. He wrote that:

“This misuse of RT-PCR technique is used as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments, supported by scientific safety councils and by the dominant media, to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, the destruction of the economy with the bankruptcy of entire active sectors of society, the degradation of living conditions for a large number of ordinary citizens, under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients.”

Clear and conclusive scientific evidence proves that these tests are not accurate and create a statistically significant percentage of false positives. Positive results more likely indicate “ordinary respiratory diseases like the common cold.” [2]

However, none of this is new information to science. These facts were known at least before 2007 after a New York Times report entitled, “Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t,” (image, above) clearly showed how scientifically inaccurate PCR tests are, featuring many shocking statements from medical experts on the use of these tests, clearly laying out how they result in false positives and lead to dangerous exaggerations and false alarms. [3]

In their 2007 story the New York Times cited a prescient quote from Dr. Elizabeth Talbot, deputy state epidemiologist for the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, who said:

“One Of The Most Troubling Aspects Of The Pseudo-Epidemic Is That All The Decisions Seemed So Sensible At The Time.”

Those who run our public institutions have allowed history to repeat itself. At the head of the line of incompetence and malfeasance is the UN itself. At the media briefing on COVID-19 on March 16, 2020, the WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (photo, below) said:

“We Have A Simple Message For All Countries: Test, Test, Test.”

This insanity of testing anyone and everyone, even without symptoms has been an unmitigated global public health scandal and must be stopped. All officials in high places complicit in this crime must be prosecuted.

About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI).  John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.

[1] Kary Mullis : « Le test PCR ne permet pas de savoir si vous êtes malade », vidéo accessible sur YouTube, 9 octobre 2020.

[2] David DeGraw, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, https://www.globalresearch.ca/national-security-alert-covid-tests-scientifically-fraudulent-epidemic-false-positives/5720271

[3] New York Times,’Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t,’ Gina Kolota, Published: January 22, 2007

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method

https://principia-scientific.com/who-finally-admits-covid19-pcr-test-has-a-problem/

and

THE UK GOVERNMENT, WHICH STATES IT EVEN MORE STRONGLY THAT THE WHO. See this article below

In Brief: the PCR test and government fraud

UKR OPINION IN A NUTSHELL

December 16, 2020 Steve Cook COMMENTARY, Corruption, GOVERNMENT, HEALTH, VACCINES 0

Editorial

The PCR test is a fraud.

It cannot detect the presence in those tested of a live infectious virus. This fact is stated by many sources – including its inventor and including the government itself (see top of page 6 of this report https://ukreloaded.com/government-website-reveals-extensive-covid-cases-fraud/).

It gives thousands of false positives and even a valid positive does not mean one has the infection.

Therefore it is fraudulent to declare a “positive” (false or otherwise) a “case”.

Therefore the “cases” numbers declared by the government are massively false and intentionally misleading.

The use of those knowingly false numbers to declare such-and-such spread of the bug is deliberate deception.

To base any justification for lockdowns or indeed any measures at all upon knowingly false “cases” stats fraudulently derived from the PCR test is a fraud.

The harm done to the lives, livelihoods and liberties of the People by these fraudulently justified measures comprise crimes against the People by the subversives now embedded in our own government.

We do not owe them our cooperation and it becomes our patriotic duty to withhold that cooperation with this deception and its perpetrators by whatever lawful means we can.

What does this mean?

Well, for one thing, it means that the government has been saying to your face since the beginning of its COVID psyop attack on our country alarming news that IT KNOWS IS UNTRUE.

It means that Johnson and Hancock and the rest of the degenerate crew at Suppression Central have been going on TV and so forth and knowingly and with evident glee lying to your face.

It means that every "COVID case" announced by the government necause of a PCR test "positive" is false. A PCR test positive DOES NOT ESTABLISH the presence in the testee of the active virus.

It means that tens upon tens of thousands of "cases" are false, that the ACTUAL number of real infections is a fraction of what we have been told.

It means that all so-called "COVID Deaths" reported because a person died after testing positive on the PCR test are false.

As the "confirmed cases"stats used to justify lockdowns and other attacks upon towns, cities, communities and citizens are false, the excuse for these attacks is false and the narrative of the "Big Scary Pandemic" is false.

It means that the government is engaged in a cynical and knowing criminal fraud on a national scale and is unfit to govern.

Our ministers know this. Our MPs know this and their propaganda arm, the MSM, know this.

The fact that they have done nothing to bring the government to account for it, to question it, to expose it (an easy thing to do as the all they have to do is quote government's own website! -see above) makes them collaborators in this hostile action against the British people.

These simple facts should be shared and repeated remorselessly and hammered home relentlessly until even those most determined not to look cannot help but see it.

It is something of a platitude to say, "The truth shall set you free."

But it will.

IF you help bring it to the attention of enough people.

https://sites.google.com/view/wefightback/peoples-media-articles/gov-propaganda-and-the-pct-test-fraud?authuser=0

_

klo Ei kommentteja: