An Introduction to Holocaust Revisionism 2

Continued from Part 1
https://graviolat.blogspot.com/2020/01/an-introduction-to-holocaust-revisionism.html

An Introduction to Holocaust Revisionism - Part 2

EDU

• The Americans had a camp at Auschwitz before the Germans.
• The Monowitz industrial complex was where most of Auschwitz’s inmates were put to work in a variety of heavy industries, ranging from rubber manufacture, medical supplies, armaments and clothing.
• Auschwitz produced synthetic rubber, medical and armament supplies.
• Siemens airplane factory at Bobrek sub‐camp, an airplane factory called Siemens
  Schuckert Werke.
• The tailor’s workshop at Auschwitz I, where prisoners would make up clothing for use by the German army.
• Auschwitz 2007 – Swimming Pool, Soccer Field, Post Office.
• There were six camp orchestras at Auschwitz/Birkenau alone, one of which contained no less than 100-120 musicians.
• Auschwitz was visited monthly by International Red Cross inspection teams. 
• Block 10 at Auschwitz: the prisoner’s hospital block. Ironically, this hospital is directly in front of what is now claimed to be a “gas chamber”.

These 'Holocaust' truth-telling pages are repeatedly attacked

An Introduction to Holocaust Revisionism

“GERMANY MUST PERISH!” – THEODORE N. KAUFMAN

Germany Must Perish! is a book written by the Jewish businessman Theodore N. Kaufman in 1941, which advocates for the genocide of the German people.

The only written plan for genocide during World War II was not a German plan to exterminate the Jews but rather a Jewish plan to exterminate the Germans. Before there was any mention of a so — called “Holocaust,” and while America was still neutral, American Zionists, with the approval of the media, produced the most mass genocidic book in history: Theodore N. Kaufman in Germany Must Perish (Argyle Press, Newark, 1941) literally urged the sterilization of 48,000,000 German men and women of childbearing age, so that, he explained, Germanism will be extirpated in two generations. Kaufman’s fervent proposal for the systematic sterilization of the entire German population was given respectful attention in the American press, including reviews in a number of newspapers. A review in the weekly Time magazine, March 24, 1941, called Kaufman’s plan a “sensational idea.”

JEWS LIVED OPENLY IN BERLIN & 150,000 JEWS SERVED IN THE GERMAN MILITARY

Did you know that some Jews lived openly in Berlin during the war, with synagogue services? When the Soviets entered Berlin, they found over 800 who had been sheltered in a hospital that was open throughout the war. How could this be? Judaic folk also lived peacefully in other parts of wartime Europe. Gertrude Stein, et al, spent the war in German-allied Vichy France. And, we must not fail to mention the 150,000 (probably more) Jews and mischlinge (“mixed”; part-Jewish) who served in the German military. Others were made “Honorary Aryans” and rewarded for their services to the Reich. For more about Jews living in National Socialist Germany during the war, see Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers by Bryan Mark Rigg, 2002. He and the Holocaust fundamentalists seem astounded, and annoyed, that few, if any, of these assimilated Jews and part-Jews seem to have known anything at all about the alleged atrocities. Of course, neither Rigg nor Lucy Dawidowicz, et al, ever considers that they did not recall anything because nothing like that actually happened!

800 Jews Lived Through “Holocaust” In A Berlin Hospital
800 German Jews spent all their war time in a Jewish Hospital in Berlin. Something strange while an “extermination plan” was supposedly running to kill all of them.

Md. Holocaust Survivor Makes a Point of Speaking Out 
By Ben Blumberg

Klaus Zwilsky, 74, of Calvert County MD, is a Holocaust survivor. However, his story is relatively unique among Jews who emerged from the horrors of Nazi Germany. He was not sent to a concentration camp, nor did he spend World War II hiding in the home of a sympathetic non-Jew. Instead, Zwilsky survived in a Jewish hospital in Berlin, with the knowledge, and consent, of the Nazi government.
“We were very fortunate to survive,” he said. He remembers the Gestapo, German secret police, ordering members of his extended family off to the concentration camp at Theresienstadt in January of 1943. “Most of the family got wiped out.”
Zwilsky is one of twenty who were interviewed for Daniel B. Silver’s book “Refuge in Hell: How Berlin’s Jewish Hospital Outlasted the Nazis.” The book details how the 800 or so Jews living in the hospital managed to survive in the capital of Nazi Germany. Causes range from bureaucratic infighting to German leader Adolf Hitler’s ambivalence about how to handle Jews of German descent to the simple fact that the Nazis needed a place to treat Jews.
However, that survivor insists in telling that it was a miracle he passed through the “extermination plan” because:
“We didn’t know at the time,” he said, that the Nazis were systematically executing Jews. “You find out all these things afterwards.”
Revisionist history is amazing–and so educational as well. Just think, there were all these Jews in the Nazi capital, being well-treated in a Jewish hospital there, without ever knowing that a holocaust was going on at the same time. Incredible.

Synagogue Allowed In Berlin During The War
In the middle of World War II, the Jewish community negotiated with the Gestapo for the sale of their synagogue, which happened to be down the road from Hitler’s HQ.

In Die Synagoge Rykestraße (1904–2004) a book on the history of the Rykestrasse Synagogue in Berlin, written by a former head rabbi at that institution, he writes:

“The Jewish school in the front building was forced to close in 1941. However, the Jewish community formally remained proprietor of the site. In May 1942 the borough of Prenzlauer Berg declared its will to acquire the site paying the ridiculous sum of reichsmark 191,860 and with effect of 1 September 1944 the site was conveyanced to the borough. When on 6 May 1943 the Jewish community applied at the Gestapo for a sale permission, since all its property was under custodianship as were any sales proceeds, it named the Heeresstandortverwaltung I Berlin (German Army garrison administration no. I) as the tenant of all the site, except of two little apartments in the front building still rented out to residential tenants.”– (Hermann Simon (Die Synagoge Rykestraße (1904–2004), Berlin: Hentrich & Hentrich and Stiftung Neue Synagoge Berlin / Centrum Judaicum, 2004, (Jüdische Miniaturen; vol. 17)
Daily life of German Jews during the war (Three documents)

The Germans considered the Jews as a whole to be representatives of a hostile belligerent power, all the more formidable since, internationally, it disposed of considerable resources in the field of finance (money, the sinew of war) and in those of the communications media and propaganda. Physical attacks engendered reprisals, which in turn gave rise to new attacks. Just as the Americans or the Canadians, considering persons of Japanese descent dangerous or hostile, decided – notwithstanding the absence of attacks or sabotage on their part – to place them in concentration camps, the Germans proceeded to evacuate large numbers of German Jews, putting them in concentration, labour or transit camps. However, a certain Jewish life subsisted openly in Germany all through the war. The three documents below make it possible to provide a sketch of that daily life: a newspaper, an excerpt from the telephone directory, a ration card. Obviously, the longer the war went on the further that daily life deteriorated, as did, for that matter, the lives of other Germans.

THE EINSATZGRUPPEN — MYTH AND REALITY

Chapter reproduced from The Six Million: Fact or Fiction by Peter Winter

Anti-Partisan Warfare—The Real Purpose of the Einsatzgruppen (“Task Forces”)
From September 1947 to April 1948, a series of trials took place in Nuremberg known as the “Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals.” Better known as the “Einsatzgruppen Trials,” these proceedings laid the basis for the allegations that German “Special Action Groups” operating behind German lines in occupied Russia, murdered millions of people, mostly Jews, by mass shootings.
The defendants in the trials were the surviving commanding officers of the Einsatzgruppen, and as many senior officers as could be found—twentyfour in total. 

All were charged with three offenses:

1. Crimes against humanity through persecutions on political, racial, and religious grounds; murder; extermination; imprisonment; and other inhumane acts committed against civilian populations, including German nationals and nationals of other countries, as part of an organized scheme of genocide.
2. War crimes for the same reasons, and for wanton destruction and devastation not justified by military necessity.
3. Membership of criminal organizations, the SS, the Sicherheitsdienst (SD), or the Gestapo, which had been declared criminal organizations previously in the international Nuremberg Military Tribunals.

The astute observer will see immediately that the third charge was bogus: The men were put on trial for the “crime” of belonging to an organization which was perfectly legal at the time when they joined, and only declared a “criminal organization” after the war ended. All the defendants were convicted of this third charge—of course—and so it can be safely said that one-third of all the convictions at the Einsatzgruppen Trial were legally fraudulent. The evidence prepared on the other two charges was obtained mainly from “confessions” extracted from the accused under torture, as detailed below.
The Einsatzgruppen were set up with two purposes, all of which was openly stated in the authentic and surviving German documentation. These purposes were, firstly, to physically eliminate the entire Soviet Communist Party Commissar structure in areas occupied by the German army as it advanced eastward; and secondly to coordinate anti-partisan fighting behind the front line so as to ensure that there was as little disruption as possible to German supply lines. The Einsatzgruppen were therefore active military units mostly engaged in active combat with Communist partisans, and not simply, as the allegation goes, “mobile killing units.” In fact, Franz Stahlecker, commander of Einsatzgruppen A in the Baltic region and White Russia, was himself killed by partisans in 1942.
Soviet records claimed that in three years of warfare, from July 1941 to July 1944, Soviet partisans in Byelorussia “eliminated approximately 500,000 German soldiers and officers, 47 Generals, blew up 17,000 enemy military transports and 32 armored trains, destroyed 300,000 railway tracks, 16,804 vehicles and a great number of other material supplies of all kinds” (.S. Telpuchowski, Die Geschichte des Grossen Vaterländischen Krieges 1941– 1945, Bernard & Graefe Verlag für Wehrwesen, Frankfurt/Main 1961, p. 284.). These losses, it bears remembering, were in one sector of the Eastern front alone, and therefore give the reader an idea of the scale and intensity of the war behind the German front line.
Given these figures, it comes as no surprise to understand the real nature of the Einsatzgruppen—as anti-partisan units. In fact, the only surprise is how small they were. Each Einsatzgruppen consisted at maximum strength of 900 men, which meant that the total force deployed by all four units in Russia never exceeded 2,700 men—and that at full strength, which was never the actual case. In spite of their relatively tiny numbers, it is claimed by the Holocaust storytellers that these 2,700 men killed anywhere between one and three million people by shooting them in mass execution style. The sheer logistics of this undertaking—bearing in mind the Einsatzgruppen only worked from July 1941 to late 1943—should by itself make the mass murder allegations out to be preposterous—but, as the reader will see, all the “evidence” submitted at the trial was compiled under duress— as was later openly admitted by the Chief Prosecutor.
Nonetheless, the order to physically eliminate the Soviet Commissar structure is in fact the closest to the truth that the entire “Holocaust” story ever comes. There were tens of thousands of Commissars—and, because of the close affiliation between Soviet Jews and the Communist Party, large numbers of these Commissars were Jews. It was therefore to be expected that the Einsatzgruppen would, as part of their activities, execute large numbers of Jews.

Benjamin Ferencz, Jewish Chief Prosecutor at the Einsatzgruppen Trials, Admits to Using Forced Confessions and Death Threats
The American Army’s Chief Prosecutor at the Einsatzgruppen Trials was not even an American, but a Hungarian Jew by the name of Benjamin Ferencz, who in 1945 had somehow been “assigned” to the job of setting up a war crimes branch and “collecting evidence” for the trials. In this capacity, he was sent to concentration camps in western Germany which had been seized by the American Army. Ferencz was therefore primarily responsible for the “evidence” presented to the Einsatzgruppen Trial, and it is his “work” which is still today presented as “proof” that the German Task Forces killed vast numbers of people in the East.
In a much later—and rare—candid moment, Ferencz openly admitted that he had used threats of summary execution against civilians to “obtain confessions.” In an interview with The Washington Post in 2005, Ferencz explained it this way: “You know how I got witness statements? I’d go into a village where, say, an American pilot had parachuted and been beaten to death and line everyone one up against the wall. Then I’d say, ‘Anyone who lies will be shot on the spot.’ It never occurred to me that statements taken under duress would be invalid” (“Giving Hitler Hell,” The Washington Post, July 24, 2005.). In the same interview, Ferencz also confessed to being at least a passive participant, or observer, in the torturing of captured Nazis at a concentration camp: “I once saw DPs [Displaced Persons] beat an SS man and then strap him to the steel gurney of a crematorium. They slid him in the oven, turned on the heat and took him back out. Beat him again, and put him back in until he was burnt alive. I did nothing to stop it. I suppose I could have brandished my weapon or shot in the air, but I was not inclined to do so. Does that make me an accomplice to murder?” (“Giving Hitler Hell,” the Washington Post, July 24, 2005).

Below: Jewish Chief Prosecutor Benjamin Ferencz. 
He later openly admitted to obtaining his evidence by threatening to kill innocent civilians, and by participating in the torture death of an SS man at a concentration camp.

These admissions by the Chief Prosecutor in the Einsatzgruppen Trials casts an immediate shadow over the entire proceedings. Is this the sort of “objective” legal person who can be relied upon to produce evidence at a major trial? The dreadful irony of a Jewish Chief Prosecutor at Nuremberg threatening to kill German civilians in order to gain “confessions” about Germans allegedly killing Jews, will not be lost upon the reader.

The Einsatzgruppen Ereignismeldungen (“Event Reports”)
The Einsatzgruppen sent irregular reports by radio, known as the Ereignismeldungen (EM), back to Berlin on their activities. Once received in Berlin, they were transcribed and edited by civil servants, and distributed in summary format, called the Tätigkeits- und Lageberichte (TuLBs) der Einsatzgruppen, to non-SS offices such as the German Foreign Office. In total, there are 194 Ereignismeldungen, 7 TuLBs der Einsatzgruppen and 12 TuLBs of Einsatzgruppen B in existence today—all of them copies, and none in the original. The accuracy and authenticity of these reports has long been open to question, primarily because the originals have never been produced, and secondly because even though the officers charged with transcribing the reports attested to the general report-capturing nature of their work, the actual copies which have been produced show clear signs of postwar additions.

One such typical example, “Einsatzgruppen Report No. 111,” contains not only completely garbled wording, but also a clear addition to the end of a paragraph (highlighted in italics below): 
“These were the motives for the executions carried out by the Kommandos: 
Political officials, looters and saboteurs, active Communists and political representatives, Jews who gained their release from prison camps by false statements, agents and informers of the NKVD [National Commissariat for Internal Affairs], persons who, by false depositions and influencing witnesses, were instrumental in the deportation of ethnic Germans, Jewish sadism and revengefulness, undesirable elements, partisans, Politruks, dangers of plague and epidemics, members of Russian bands, armed insurgents—provisioning of Russian bands, rebels and agitators, drifting juveniles, Jews in general.”
The authenticity question surrounding the Ereignismeldungen and TuLBs has been further questioned by researchers because, once again, like so much other “evidence” of Nazi atrocities, the documents emerged from the Soviet occupation zone. It is a common tactic of Holocaust storytellers to claim that the Ereignismeldungen were “captured” or “seized” by the US Army when they “took the Gestapo Headquarters”—but this is another blatant lie, because the Gestapo headquarters were located at 8 Prinz Albert Street in Berlin, and were captured by the Soviets in April 1945.
Even the chief prosecutor at the Einsatzgruppen Trials, the self-admitted forced confession expert, Benjamin Ferencz, admitted in his memoirs that the “copies” of the Ereignismeldungen which the Americans had, and which were used in the trial, originated with the copies held by the German Foreign Office —in Berlin, which makes them also originally Soviet-origin papers.

Finally, the trial of German Field Marshal Erich von Manstein, in August 1949, cast further doubt over the accuracy of the Ereignismeldungen. Charged with overseeing the Einsatzgruppen activities in his command sector on the Eastern Front, Von Manstein denied all the allegations, and his British lawyer R. T. Paget demonstrated that whole areas which the Ereignismeldungen claimed had been “cleared of Jews” (Judenfrei) contained many flourishing Jewish communities that were actually fully functional and untouched throughout the entire war.

The trial court accepted this argument—that the Ereignismeldungen were unreliable—and Von Manstein was acquitted on that charge. Nonetheless, the Ereignismeldungen are widely regarded as authentic by Holocaust storytellers—even though this claim, if true, raises more problems with the Holocaust narrative then it does to “prove” it. Firstly, to address the numbers claimed killed by the Einsatzgruppen in the Ereignismeldungen. If the reports are genuine, then the total number of killings—due to the intense combat and subsequent executions—is unreliable by virtue of the fact that the surviving reports are incomplete. Secondly, in accordance with the stated purpose of the Einsatzgruppen, the Ereignismeldungenlist deaths which were due to both the ferocious antipartisan warfare as well as executions. For example, by the autumn of 1941, Einsatzgruppen B reported having executed 1500 partisans. Thirdly, the surviving Ereignismeldungen also reveal that by late 1942, there were no more “Jewish Actions” (Judenaktionen) taking place—meaning that after that time, no formal anti-Jewish operations took place, and the rest of the Task Forces’ existence was taken up with anti-partisan operations.

The “Confession”—and Retraction—of Einsatzgruppen Commander Otto Ohlendorf
SS-Gruppenführer Otto Ohlendorf was the commanding officer of Einsatzgruppen D, which was deployed in Moldova, south Ukraine, the Crimea, and the north Caucasus. Arrested after the war, he was initially not charged with any crimes and instead called as witness for the prosecution in front of the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg in January 1946. There, under cross examination, Ohlendorf claimed that his Task Force had killed 90,000 people, Jews and non-combatants, that from the Spring of 1942, women and children had been executed in “gas vans,” that the victims were all buried in trenches, and that he had personally been present at two mass shootings. Despite this “confession,” Ohlendorf was not charged with any crime until 1948, when he was arraigned as a defendant in the Einsatzgruppen Trial mentioned above.

At the 1948 trial, he completely recanted his 1946 confession, claiming that it had been extracted from him by force. In his recantation, Ohlendorf never mentioned killing children; declared that the Einsatzgruppen were merely engaged in fighting an anti-partisan war;

that he knew nothing about gas vans; and reduced the number of executions under his command to 40,000. Furthermore, Ohlendorf continued, he denied any knowledge of, or participation in, any grand genocide plans, testifying as follows: [Ohlendorf Direct Examination Testimony. Questions posed by his defense lawyer, Dr Aschenauer.]

Q. Did you know about plans or directives which had as their goal the extermination on racial and religious grounds?
A. I expressly assure you that I neither knew of such plans nor was I called on to cooperate in any such plans. Lieutenant General [Obergruppenfuehrer] Bach-Zelewski testified during the big trial [before the International Military Tribunal] that the Reich Leader SS in a secret conference of all lieutenant generals made known that the goal was to exterminate thirty million Slavs. I repeat that I was neither given such an order nor was there even the slightest hint, given to me that such plans or goals existed for the Russian campaign. This is not only true for the Slavs but this is also true for the Jews. I know that in the years of 1938, 1939 and 1940, no extermination plans existed, but on the contrary, with the aid of Heydrich and by cooperation with Jewish organizations, emigration programs from Germany and Austria were arranged; financial funds even were raised in order to help aid the poorer Jews to make this emigration possible.

The presiding judge at the 1948 trial rejected Ohlendorf’s recantation, and refused to consider it as evidence—effectively convicting Ohlendorf and the others on the basis of the earlier “confession” which had been extracted under duress. Ohlendorf expressed his bitterness at the refusal to acknowledge that his earlier “confession” had been forced from him, and in his closing statement to the 1948 trial, said the following: “I have been now in the Palace of Justice in Nuremberg for two and a half years. What I have seen here of life as a spiritual force, in these two and half years, has increased my fear. Human beings who under normal conditions were decent citizens of their country were deprived of their basic conception of law, custom, and morals by the power of the victors.” After he was sentenced to death—on the basis of his forced confession and no other physical evidence—Ohlendorf went into attack mode, telling the Jewish chief prosecutor Benjamin Ferencz that “the Jews in America would suffer for what he [Ferencz] had done” (Nuremberg Trials and Tribulations, 1946–1949, Chapter 4, Benjamin Ferencz). Ohlendorf also publicly attacked the Jewish attorney-general of the “Bavarian State Office for Restitution,” Philip Auerbach, who had announced that he was “seeking compensation for eleven million Jews who had suffered in concentration camps.” Ohlendorf said that “not the minutest part” of the people for whom Auerbach was seeking compensation had even seen a concentration camp. Ohlendorf lived to see Auerbach convicted of embezzlement and fraud before his own execution finally took place in 1951.


The Wildly Varying Numbers of Einsatzgruppen “Victims”
The wildly varying numbers of victims claimed for the Einsatzgruppen also reveal much about the “accuracy” of this story. – In the book Jews in the Soviet Union, by Solomon M. Schwarz (Syracuse Univ. Press., Syracuse 1951, p. 220), it is claimed that 3 million people were shot by the Einsatzgruppen. – In the book Die Truppe des Weltanschauungskrieges. Die Einsatzgruppen der Sicherheitspolizei und des SD 1938–1942, by H. Krausnick, H.-H. Wilhelm (Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, Stuttgart 1981, p. 333), it is claimed that 2.2 million people were shot by the Einsatzgruppen. – In the book The Destruction of European Jewry by “Holocaust expert” Raul Hilberg (Quadrangle Books, Chicago 1961; pb: Harper & Row, New York 1983; 2nd ed., Holmes & Meyer, New York 1985), it is claimed that 1.3 million people were shot by the Einsatzgruppen. In the Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, issued by the US Holocaust Memorial Museum, it is claimed that “over 1 million” people were shot by the Einsatzgruppen. All of these sources claim to quote “eyewitnesses” and “official records.” The fact that the number of victims claimed can vary so wildly from 1 to 3 million, shows an obvious flaw in the “proof” available.

THE ALLEGED BABI YAR MASSACRE DEBUNKED

The Babi Yar Massacre in Kiev: Wartime Aerial Photography Exposes the Lie
One of the most infamous atrocities attributed to the Einsatzgruppen (in this case, Einsatzgruppen C) is an alleged mass-murder outside Kiev in the Ukraine, known as the Babi Yar massacre. The allegation is that after the Germans occupied Kiev, a series of bombs, set off by Communist insurgents, struck the city, killing many civilians and German occupying troops. Much of the city was set on fire as a result of the bombings, and as German troops helped with putting out the blaze, a Jewish insurgent was caught cutting one of the water hoses. According to the Holocaust storytellers, the arrest of this Jew persuaded the Nazis that all the Jews in Kiev had to be killed, and Einsatzgruppen C rounded them all up over the period of September 29–30, 1941, marched them to a ravine outside the city, and shot them all—some 33,771 individuals.

The “evidence” for this atrocity is contained in one of the disputed Ereignismeldungen, where the report specifically gives the figure of 33,771 Jews having been shot in Kiev on that date. Once again, the Ereignismeldungen report is open to question—because the physical facts surrounding the Babi Yar ravine do not support the report’s claim. There are today no remains of tens of thousands of bodies to be found at the Babi Yar site, even though a monument now stands on the spot. The Holocaust storytellers claim that the reason why there are no bodies to be found at the site—even though the story claims 33,771 people were shot there—is because the Nazis sent a special team back to the site in 1943 to exhume, burn, and crush the bones—using, of all things, tombstones from a nearby Jewish cemetery to smash the last of the bones. Of course, the time, effort and fuel it would take to exhume, stack on iron rails, burn and then crush 33,000 bodies makes the allegation absurd—but nonetheless, this is the given reason why there are no bodies present.

The Soviets even produced a compliant German officer, SS-Standartenfuhrer Paul Blobel, to “confess” to having destroyed all the 33,771 bodies within a period of thirty days, from August 18 to September 19, 1943. The “confessions” remind the reader of those “obtained” by the Soviets to cover up the Katyn massacre, which was also blamed on the Germans. In fact, the parallels with Katyn offer a further valuable insight into the Babi Yar claims. The mass graves created for the Soviet massacre and burial of Polish officers and intellectuals at Katyn (a crime that for fifty years was blamed on the Germans), as well as the graves used to accommodate the bodies of some 100,000 innocent residents, including children, of Hamburg, Germany, that were slaughtered by Allied bombing, have proven that it takes about a one acre area of excavation material to bury roughly 10,000 bodies. Babi Yar would have needed a minimum of three and one half acres for 33,000 bodies. There is, therefore, no possibility that the precision aerial photos available from the period in question would not show such a disturbance in the soil. Even if the mass grave’s depth is increased to sixteen feet, 50,000 bodies would take up about one and a half acres. Approximately 1,600,000 cubic feet of soil would need to be excavated. This would be a major excavation project even for today’s modern heavy equipment. Any claim that it was done in 1941, and once again in 1943 under battle conditions, is pure fantasy. This does not even address the question of where was this equipment obtained on a battle-weary front?

There are a host of other physical problems associated with the Babi Yar massacre story. For example: – In order to “machine gun” people, it is worth emphasizing that twice as many bullets as the given number of people would be needed.

If 33,771 people were shot, then the Germans would have needed at least 67,000 rounds—and probably more—to complete the task. Such a large amount of ammunition would weigh about 1,876 pounds, or 850 kilograms. Lead is essentially an inert substance which survives practically forever in the soil. That amount of lead should be easily recoverable on the site—if it had been shot out there, but not a trace of it has ever been found. – Next there is the matter of the fuel needed for cremation of the bodies, which the Holocaust storytellers say took place two years after these “murders” and while the German army was in full retreat in that sector. The Holocaust storytellers claim that the bodies were burned in the open, with wood, after being piled onto iron rails. Present-day open air cremations, as carried out in India amongst Hindus, require at least 10 hours per body, and 330 pounds (150 kilograms) of wood. This would mean that the cremation of 33,771 bodies would require at least 11 million pounds (5 million) kilograms of wood. To believe that anyone could cut down and provide that amount of firewood in the face of a rapidly advancing Soviet Army is about as nonsensical as believing that the removal of so many trees in the nearby area could go unnoticed. – Furthermore, the “mass murder” of Jews at Babi Yar allegedly took place almost four months prior to the Wannsee Conference, where, the Holocaust storytellers claim, the idea to kill all the Jews was first planned.

The Babi Yar allegations therefore, fairly typically, raise more questions than answers. Finally, aerial photography, held in the US National Archives in Washington DC, contains 600 wartime aerial photographs of Kiev, including Babi Yar, taken on over 20 flights over the area. The first photos, taken at 12:23 pm on May 17, 1939, reveal such details as cars and even the shadows of the lamp posts on the streets of Kiev. More importantly, every large bush and small tree is visible on the slopes and at the bottom of the Babi Yar ravine. The last aerial photo coverage of Kiev (and Babi Yar) took place on June 18, 1944, about nine months after the city was re-occupied by the Soviets. These reconnaissance photos show clearly that the foliage and ground cover of the ravine remained completely undisturbed throughout the two years of German occupation, and that there is absolutely no evidence of human activity in the ravine.

Below: Wartime aerial photograph of the Babi Yar Ravine, taken at the exact time that the SS was allegedly exhuming, cremating, and crushing tens of thousands of bodies. If the Babi Yar massacre had occurred as claimed, the whole area would have seen massive earth displacements, burning stacks of bodies, and frenetic human activity. Instead, the entire area is completely undisturbed. The photo is available from the US National Archives and is listed as: GX 3938 SG, exposure 105.

The claims of a “massacre” at Babi Yar Ravine do not, therefore, match up with the physical evidence, and also cast a serious shadow over the reliability of the Ereignismeldungen.
1.3.2. The Alleged Babi Yar Massacre (Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf, Thomas Kues)

Of all the mass shootings allegedly perpetrated by the Germans and their local helpers on the Eastern Front, the Babi Yar massacre is the most notorious. On 29 September 1941, 33,711 Jews are said to have been killed at the Babi Yar ravine near Kiev. Predictably, Jonathan Harrison uncritically accepts the official version of Babi Yar in his chapter about the “Extermination of Soviet Jews, June 1941-March 1942.” (p. 100)
Udo Walendy and Herbert Tiedemann have documented the wild implausibility of the official version of Babi Yar. As just one example, the various “witnesses” to this alleged crime flagrantly contradict each other on the most basic issue of identifying the killing instrument: the victims were shot with rifles, or submachine guns, or slaughtered with bayonets, or buried alive, or blown up by mines, or squashed with tanks, or killed by means of lethal injections, or drowned in the Dnieper, or exploded by hand grenades, or had their heads crushed with rocks, or were suffocated gas vans. 41 Needless to say, none of these embarrassing discrepancies are mentioned by Harrison.
Had the Germans really murdered more than 33,000 Jews on the outskirts of Kiev on 29-30 September 1941, the Soviet government would have learned of this atrocity within days and immediately denounced it in the strongest terms. As it happens, the first official mention of the “massacre” came at an impossibly late date. On 6 January 1942, Soviet foreign minister V. Molotov stated that “a large number” of Jews had been stripped naked, beaten (!) and shot in the Jewish cemetery of Kiev.
So much for “eyewitness testimony.” What about forensic remains? According to the official version of the Babi Yar story, the bodies of the victims were dug up and burned by the SS in September 1943, as the Red Army was approaching the Ukrainian capital, in order to destroy all evidence of the crime. If we are to believe the “witnesses,” this mass cremation action wrapped up just before the end of the month. Yet on September 26, the German Luftwaffe flew a reconnaissance mission over Kiev, taking aerial photographs of numerous parts of the city, including the district in which Babi Yar was located. In 1992, revisionist researcher John Ball obtained a copy of the Babi Yar photograph from U.S. archives, and published it. His commentary encapsulates what any objective observer can see from the photograph itself:
“1943 air photos of Babi Yar ravine and the adjacent Jewish cemetery in Kiev reveal that neither the soil nor the vegetation is disturbed, as would be expected if materials and fuel had been transported one week earlier to hundreds of workers who had dug up and burned tens of thousands of bodies in one month.”
However, it remains to be noted that the killing of 33,711 Jews near Kiev is indeed mentioned in one of the Einsatzgruppen reports. So either the report is a forgery, or it is formally authentic but historically inaccurate. In either case, the report casts doubts on the authenticity, or veracity, of the Einsatzgruppen reports as a whole.

Does this mean that no Jews were shot near Kiev in late September 1941? Indeed it does not. As soon as German troops had occupied the Ukrainian capital on September 19, 1941, tremendous explosions rocked the city, and on 25 September a major fire caused widespread damage. Before long, mines had destroyed almost all public buildings, and hundreds of German soldiers and Ukrainian civilians had perished. To this kind of terrorist activity the German military typically responded as occupying armies throughout history have responded to similar provocation: with reprisals.
If shown hard evidence that two or three thousand Jews were indeed shot towards the end of September 1941, I would not be overly surprised. Since the Germans would not have wanted to alienate the local ethnic Ukrainians (many of whom had welcomed them as liberators from the “Jewish”-Communist yoke), according to the grim logic of war the local Jews would have emerged as the natural target of such reprisals.
In any case, crucial questions remain unanswered. If a certain number of Jews were indeed killed, and if the killing itself was indeed carried out at one location in Babi Yar, why do the various “eyewitness” reports allege such wildly differing – and absurd – killing methods? On the other hand, if reprisals were carried out at another location (and in fact, Babi Yar is not mentioned at all in the respective Einsatzgruppen report), why did the Soviets not identify the place of execution correctly? After all, in the absence of external observers to check their assertions, they could have claimed as many victims as they wanted either way.

http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=28http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/28-tecoar.pdf
4.3. Babi Yar (Air Photo Evidence, John Ball)

It is said that after the city of Kyiv was occupied by German troops the Jews of this city were taken to Babi Yar, a ravine at the northwestern edge of the city, near the Jewish cemetery. According to eyewitness accounts, they were shot there, thrown into the ravine, and buried – according to some witness statements, the ravine was also blasted and the bodies buried under the rubble.

In late summer of 1943, when the Front retreated again, the bodies were allegedly exhumed and cremated on gigantic funeral pyres or in pits. These activities allegedly ended on September 28, 1943, when the Kyiv area was already part of the main battle zone.
Illustration 3 shows the ravine of Babi Yar in an air photo taken by the Luftwaffe on September 26, 1943. The part of the ravine (near the Jewish cemetery) where the massacre allegedly took place is shown as enlargement in illustration 4. What we see is in fact a placid and peaceful valley. Neither the topography nor the vegetation has been disrupted by human intervention. There are no access roads for the transport of humans or fuel, no fuel depots, no excavations, no burning sites, and no smoke.
We may conclude with certainty that no part of the Babi Yar ravine was subjected to topographical changes of any magnitude during the war years right up to the Soviet reoccupation of the area. The vegetation in this valley was also not disturbed.[16] Hence, there can have been no mass graves in these locations, and the mass cremations attested to can also not have taken place at this time.
http://vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndaerial.html

This photo was taken in the middle of the 4 week period when thousands of corpses were allegedly being exhumed and cremated each day in the ravine bottom. There is no evidence of trails from trucks, horses, or people in the ravine, and no evidence of mass exhumations or cremations.

What Happened at Babi Yar? Fact vs. Myth
“Little Evidence Supports Story of Nazi Atrocity”

William Lawrence’s famous doubting Thomas article about Babi Yar, which appeared in November 29, 1943 edition of The New York Times. Much worth noting is Lawrence’s assertion that: “No witness to the shooting appeared before the (Kiev Atrocity) commission or talked with the (Anglo-American-Soviet) correspondence.” Because 24 years later at the West German trial of SS men who partook in the September 1941 massacre of 33,771 Jews at Babi Yar, it was reported that the majority of 175 witnesses who appeared in court to testify, were there to recount what they claimed to have witnessed at Babi Yar!

A REFUTATION OF FALSE CLAIMS BY DAVID IRVING AND DAVID COLE REGARDING MASS KILLINGS IN THE REINHARDT TRANSIT CAMPS

David Ivring is a brilliant historian of World War II but since being persecuted by the establishment for questioning the fictional Holocaust narrative it is evident that David Irving has been compromised into making false claims. Claims which are easily refuted.
David Irving has made the statement that 2.4 million Jews were exterminated in the Reinhardt transit camps without evidence and his claim is even 900,000 MORE than official Jewish “Holocaust historian” Raul Hilberg claimed. There is no physical evidence to support the claim of mass murder in the Reinhardt transit camps. If 900,000 to 2.4 million were exterminated there would be mass graves with a huge amount of human remains. There are no mass graves because the killings never happened. If there weremass graves they would have been excavated and fully exploited by the Holocaust propaganda lobby decades ago. Irving’s claims were refuted by Jürgen Graf in his 2009 article David Irving and the “Aktion Reinhardt Camps”. Also at: http://juergen-graf.vho.org/articles/david-irving-and-the-aktion-reinhardt-camps.html

“Talking Frankly” about David Irving
A Critical Analysis of David Irving’s Statement on the Holocaust
By Hadding Scott

The following article is a critical analysis of some statements made by British historian David Irving in a “privately filmed interview” of April 2009 lasting over 2 hours, and entitled, “Talking Frankly.” Until early 2016, this interview was available only on DVD. It was posted on YouTube in March 2016.

After his testimony for Ernst Zündel in 1988, David Irving seemed to be an intellectual hero in full self-actualization. He said in a 1988 speech that he knew that he had “joined the ranks of the damned” and that the next five to ten years would be difficult, but that he would persevere. David Irving’s stand for Holocaust Revisionism seemed to be an expression of his long-evident character as the historian who intended to correct the omissions and distortions of victors’ history. Holocaust Revisionism seemed to be consistent with the essence of David Irving, the logical next stage in the evolution of the heroic historian.
But in retrospect, with greater knowledge, one can see that David Irving’s truth-advocacy was never entirely free of hesitation. While David Irving seemed to be an uncompromising truthteller, one can just barely discern the influence of calculated self-interest and the moistened finger in the breeze, even in his most outspokenly controversial period. The seed of retreat was always there.
http://codoh.com/library/document/4061/

Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp? By Carlo Mattogno & Jürgen Graf
PDF: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/08-t.pdfA review by Jürgen Graf: http://codoh.com/library/document/1652/

Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf and Thomas Kues in ‘The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt”—An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious “Evidence,” Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the “Holocaust Controversies” Bloggers’
http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=28
PDF: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/28-tecoar.pdf

Revisionist documentary producer Eric Hunt wrote a comprehensive response to the baseless and dishonest claims made by David Cole in his book “Republican Party Animal” regarding the Aktion Reinhardt camps. The below extract from Eric Hunt’s response totally demolishes the claim made by David Cole and David Irving.

Response to David Cole Regarding Treblinka
By Eric Hunt

A Revisionist sent me a link to David Cole’s written response defending his alleged belief that 900,000 Jews were “gassed”, buried, dug back up, cremated, and reburied and / or scattered at Treblinka 2. I was disparaged along with my documentary and I’d like to respond.

I thank him for taking the time and keeping an open mind while watching the documentary and responding to it. I wasn’t directly disparaged too roughly by Cole, so I’d like to keep it courteous between us, if he will allow it.
To support Cole’s view on Treblinka and “Action Reinhard Death Camps”, he relies on two general documents (the Korherr Report and the Höfle Telegram), two sinister but vague entries in the Goebbels Diary and statements by Himmler.  However, Cole denies the large amount of physical, photographic, and now, testimonial evidence which supports the idea that no mass gassing could have occurred at Treblinka 2 and it primarily served as a transit camp where Jewish wealth was seized before Jews were divided into appropriate groups and sent on to other locations.

Mass Graves
There would by necessity have to be huge remnants of mass graves at a site claimed to have murdered 10 times the capacity of the 90,000 seat Los Angeles Colliseum. Ground penetrating radar can detect such enormous ground disturbances as Cole and Treblinka believers claim must exist, yet Caroline Sturdy Colls’ GPR / LIDAR radar shows no such thing.


Caroline Colls’ Ground Penetrating Radar scan actually proves “deniers” right. In the “extermination camp” quadrant of the camp (in the lower right below) there simply are no markings signifying massive mass graves which could possibly have held 900,000 bodies. Other than some smaller “pock marks”, in fact the ground looks remarkably mostly UNdisturbed.

The archaeologists chose to dig in areas which showed ground disturbances. They found nothing but fossilized shark teeth. Shouldn’t they also be able to find 25 million 200,000 Jewish teeth buried at Treblinka?

This hard evidence proves Cole has misinterpreted documents and his “code words” mean nothing when we now have undeniable proof that there are no massive ground disturbances signifying massive mass graves for the 900,000 alleged gassed, buried, dug back up, and reburied at Treblinka 2.
To clarify, there are certainly mass graves at Treblinka, mostly for those who died on the way to Treblinka. But nowhere near 900,000 could possibly have been buried in this remarkably mostly undisturbed ground.
While Cole says this physical evidence (or lack of evidence pointing to massive mass graves) is worthless, this is in fact the most important evidence, not misinterpreted documents, with added code words or speculation. The evidence is still there!
The New York accented “Chief Rabbi of Poland” refuses the complete excavation and exhumation of Treblinka that would would definitively destroy “The Holocaust” myth forever or destroy “Holocaust Denial.”
The rabbi didn’t count on non-invasive LIDAR and GPR technology being able to see through the ground, exposing the Treblinka hoax.

Where did the Jews go?
Where did the Jews go after being transited through the General Government and Warthegua districts? Likely to one of the recently admitted whopping 42,500 camps and ghettos, not the 7,000 previously thought.

Because Korherr didn’t have or write any detailed information about the Jewish population of specific ghettos and concentration camps East of modern Lviv, Cole and the exterminationists claim this is proof the Jews were gassed at Treblinka, Belzec, and Sobibor. 
Really!

In addition this quote from Korherr shows the Nazis went out of their way to transport elderly Jews to Theresienstadt (not gas them) at the same time we’re told these “evacuated Jews” (code words!) were gassed.
“Between January 1 1943 and March 3 1943 113,015 Jews were evacuated from the Reich including Bohemia and Moravia, the new Eastern Territories and the district of Bialystok to the East and 8,025 Jews were moved to the Ghetto for the Aged in Theresienstadt.” – The Korherr Report
Review of David Cole’s ‘Republican Party Animal’ by Chip Smith

No matter where the chips fall, I do think that Cole’s “exterminationist” interpretation of the Aktion Reinhardt system is superficially plausible and therefore useful. Whether it can withstand more intensive scrutiny is a different matter. Being a dilettante at best, I can only say it’s not how I would bet. Presumably for reasons of brevity, Cole neglects to directly address the copious revisionist literature in this area, so when he states that “revisionists have never produced an alternate explanation of the fate met by the Jews sent to camps like Treblinka and Sobibor, with empty trains returning” I am left to wonder whether he has read Samuel Crowell’s carefully documented treatment of the Aktion Reinhardt camps in the Nine-Banded Books edition of The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes. For what it’s worth, the relevant discussion is framed in the seldom-read fourth part of Crowell’s book, “The Holocaust in Retrospect,” where – I’m trying to save everyone time here – the most succinct statement of an “alternate explanation” (though Crowell would probably call it an “interpretation”) is advanced in the fifth section, “Aktion Reinhardt and the Legacy of Forced Labor,” beginning at page 339. Without wading too deep into the morass, Crowell offers a contextual reading of several key documents to support the revisionist position that “Aktion Reinhardt was about wealth seizure and SS control of Polish Jews, chiefly for labor purposes: It was not about mass murder.”
While Crowell’s analysis does not – indeed cannot – exclude the possibility that these sites were at some point devoted to the crudely mechanized destruction of human beings, including by mass gassing, I think he is persuasive in his interpretation of documents that render the scenario less likely than Cole asserts. For example, the authentic Franke-Gricksch inspection report (which wasn’t discovered until 2010 and is not mentioned by Cole) explicitly discusses the eastern program as a plunder operation, makes no reference to gassing, and includes population assessments that are plainly at odds with the numbers in the “final” Korherr report (which, it should be noted, has been disavowed by Korherr himself).

Crowell’s discussion of the top secret 1944 Globocnik report to Himmler along with its addendum also provides clear support for the interpretation that the AR system was primarily devoted to wealth seizure and includes an important note about “relocated persons” being given chits as a kind of bullshit assurance that “future compensation” would be rendered for their assets “some day in Brazil or in the Far East.” If the reference to “relocated persons” meant Jews – and there is a strong contextual reason to assume so, given the geographic presumption in the wording – then this addendum is difficult to reconcile with the notion that Jews were being systematically snuffed upon arrival at the camps.

David Cole, the Holocaust and Israel

I quote Cole’s own words about what he believes: ‘For the record, I never denied the Holocaust. My position was that Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, and the buildings displayed there as gas chambers are Soviet fakes. I never denied mass exterminations of Jews at camps like Treblinka and Sobibór.’
Cole is being typically disingenuous here, because he ‘denies’ that Auschwitz was used as a death camp. He claims Treblinka, Sobibor and (presumably) Belzec were ‘death camps’ and that he has ‘never denied this’. This is rank lunacy of the first order for the simple reason that the ‘evidence’ for these camps being part of a ‘mass extermination program’ targeted specifically at Jews (aka the ‘Holocaust’) is actually worse than the ‘evidence’ for Auschwitz, which Cole ‘denies’ was a ‘death camp’.

To be specific:
A) There is no physical evidence of such a homicidal purpose at the camps.

B) The ‘survivor’ testimony is even more insane and contradictory than the ‘survivor’ testimony at Auschwitz. I mean gassing people with the fumes of a captured Russian submarine’s diesel engine or killing them with electrical frying pans is hardly likely to be true in the first place let alone with the absence of other evidence (rather like the infamous ‘vacuum chambers’): is it?

C) The ‘survivors’ shouldn’t have survived a pure death camp according to the official narrative and simple applied logic.

D) The transit/logistics records directly contradict the whole claim (i.e. huge numbers of Jews can be shown to have transited through these ‘pure death camps’ came out alive and been sent on to work camps a few days later).
Cole has got to know this given that the numerous book length revisionist studies that have come out since he was around (and are freely available on the internet) that his position is frankly laughable, but hey it is all about being ‘respectable’ and reinventing his career.  After all if Cole was really interested in historical truth; he’d be speaking about why serious scholars, in the true sense of the term, of the ‘Holocaust’, such as Jurgen Graf, Thomas Kues and Carlo Mattogno, are wrong and he is right. But hey it is easier to go and bash out easy-reading copy for Takimag than dare debate those three scholars than a comedian with a PhD like Michael Shermer.
BELZEC, CHELMNO, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II

Are 2 Million People Really Buried In 74 Graves?

It is alleged in orthodox historiography that, during WW II – hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of people were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at the four very small, precisely known locations of – Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II. (Yad Vashem alleges that over two million people died at these four sites.) However, despite all the deceptive allegations / insinuations to the contrary, the simple truth is; the largest of the – four – extant so-called “huge mass graves” ever located / proven to exist at these four sites – in which actual, verified human remains have literally / truly been physically unearthed / tangibly located by archaeologists / forensic investigators – by means of bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science, contains the remains of – only six bodies!

WHAT KIND OF “TRUTH” REQUIRES LIES TO DEFEND IT?
Lest you think there must be some truth to this “huge mass graves” canard
(That’s the psychology of the big-lie technique at work)
The National Association of Forensic Historians TM presents
THE  N.A.F.H.  CRIME  SCENE  INVESTIGATION  CHALLENGE TM
$74,000.00 REWARD

For proving  –  just  1 / 1,000  of  1%  –  of the fraudulently alleged buried remains claims
http://www.nafcash.com/

The Daily Mirror reported on May 15th 1945 that 7 million were killed by the Germans at Treblinka according Moscow radio.
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/7000000-killed-at-treblinka.html

Also reported in the Derby Evening Telegraph
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/7000000-killed-at-treblinka.html

THE SOVIET AND AMERICAN DOCUMENTARY FORGERY FACTORIES

On the Soviet side:

Aside from extensively rewriting their own history, Russian forgery experts spent most of their time in producing material designed to delude, confound and mislead their perceived enemies, both domestic and foreign. Much of this began after the Second World War with extensive rewriting, editing and deliberate forgeries of German military and political documents designed to embarrass the United States and its client, the West German government, as well as to elevate the image of their own regime.
Faked reports dealing with the purported death of Hitler began the deluge and these were followed by endless papers concerning the fate of Martin Bormann who the Soviets claimed was living somewhere in the West, probably protected by the insidious Americans. The same creative writers also heavily edited and enhanced the records of German Army Group Center, captured by their military units, when that entity was overrun during the war.

One of the most ambitious Soviet productions concerned the writings of Dr. Josef Goebbels. Because handwritten documents on the original, special paper Goebbels used would have been nearly impossible to successfully fake, the new Soviet line was that the documents had actually been typed and then put onto glass negatives. These were hidden by the Germans in cases where the Soviets were able to “discover” them after the war. Having altered the Goebbels’ diaries from “several stacked folders” of handwritten material to a box of more easily forged photographs of typed manuscript, the Russians began to offer their rare, politically-incorrect material to sources in Germany for sale and publication. German experts universally rejected these productions as completely fake.

On the American side:
Among the many fraudulent historical documents that have been cited over the years by “conformist” historians of the Third Reich era, Irving said, have been the fake wartime diaries of Gerhard Engel, Hitler’s army adjutant, and of Felix Kersten, masseur and confidant of Himmler. Similarly unreliable is the diary of Mussolini’s foreign minister Galeazzo Ciano, which American officials doctored after the war. Completely fake are Hitler’s supposed “table talk” remarks from February and April 1945. Irving related that the Swiss lawyer Francois Genoud, now dead, admitted privately that he had fabricated them.

Note: The Office of Strategic Services (OSS) was the CIA’s “black propaganda” branch during WW2. At its peak in late 1944, the OSS employed almost 13,000 men and women.
https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=8107

TRENT PARK EAVESDROPPING – MORE FABRICATED ATROCITY PROPAGANDA

Trent Park is an English country house in north London. Between 1942 and 1945, it served as a prisoner-of war camp for high ranking German generals and officers of the Wehrmacht. Eighty-four generals and a number of lower ranking staff officers were brought to Trent Park. It is alleged that British Intelligence hid microphones in the ground floor rooms and secretly recorded the conversations of the German generals and officers who feeling unobserved spoke freely with each other.

 It is alleged that the secret listeners eavesdropped on admission of war crimes and terrible atrocities against Russians, Poles and Jews. However, consider the following:
1. The audio recordings do not exist! It is claimed that “when the fighting ended, the recordings were destroyed and the transcripts locked away for half a century”. It is simply absurd to believe that they would destroy the audio recordings.

2. The alleged transcripts contain claims of gassings and other known lies. All allegations of gassings have been thoroughly refuted.
Examples: “Let me tell you,” General Count Edwin von Rothkirch und Trach told General Bernhard Ramcke on March 13, 1945, “the gassings are by no means the worst.”
Kittel told Schaefer about Auschwitz: “In Upper Silesia, they simply slaughtered the people systematically. They were gassed in a big hall. There’s the greatest secrecy about all those things.”
Colonel Dr Friedrich Von der Heydte told Colonel Eberhard Wildermuth about the Theresienstadt concentration camp in Czechoslovakia: “Half a million people have been put to death there for certain. I know that all the Jews from Bavaria were taken there. Yet the camp never became over-crowded. They gassed mental defectives, too.”
In the above quote it is alleged that Friedrich Von der Heydte said that half a million people were killed at Theresienstadt concentration camp. However even mainstream historians now admit that Theresienstadt was not a death camp and do not claim half a million people were killed there.
It is alleged that the transcripts contain conversations about Babi Yar. Babi Yar is a debunked Soviet lie.

3. It is claimed that they didn’t use the recordings as evidence at Nuremberg or another trial because the information was not obtained in accordance with the Geneva Convention.
“The secret nature of the operation meant that the information was not obtained in accordance with the Geneva Convention and could not be used in trials. The generals themselves were released after 1945.”

The Nuremberg Tribunal where they specially included a clause that the court was not to be bound by the normal rules of evidence. Where fake shrunken heads, soap made from Jewish fat and lampshades made from Jewish skin (now admitted to be untrue) were presented as evidence and where torture was used to extract “confessions” yet they would not use evidence from recorded conversations? This claim is simply laughable.
4. It is claimed that “The largest proportion of the ‘listeners’ were German-speaking Jewish exiles who had fled Nazi Germany and Austria and recruited to carry out this job.” The fact that the alleged listeners and transcribers were Jewish exiles from Germany brings into question the reliability of the transcriptions. The German-speaking Jewish refugees would have been extremely prejudiced and could be expected to invent fabrications about what they heard.

Holocaust evidence through eavesdropping?
https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=7540

Comment on this article NOW! / recorded conversations claims
https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2693

Allied recordings show German POWs laughing about atrocities
https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7240

Channel Four claims it has proved the holocaust
https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=7942

The bogus Bruns document
https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=15

Bruns admits confession was fake
https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=1311

recorded conversations not – ‘pumpkins/music directors’
https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=366

yet another bogus conversation, this one about ‘gassings’
https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=352

Bogus alleged ‘conversation’ about Babi Yar
https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=345

HOLOCAUST PROPAGANDA LIES ABOUT DR. JOSEF MENGELE

No one personifies the “evils of the Nazis” more than Dr. Josef Mengele. I have collected a number of materials about Mengele over the years including one of his published essays and his SS personnel records which show that he himself contracted typhus while at Auschwitz. He was a thoroughly decent and admirable man in every respect whose principal shortcoming was his choice of a name. I never came across even the vaguest shred of documentation that he ever conducted any atrocious procedures or experiments anywhere, ever. The case against him is all blah-blah from the likes of Ada Bimko and Eva Kor and Irene Zisblatt! It is incredible how Mengele has been vilified entirely on the basis of such blah-blah. Shame on the press and “scholars” for being so vile and stupid.
If anyone has ever seen a shred of documentation of any atrocious procedures or experiments by Mengele, please post it here.
– Friedrich Paul Berg

Carlo Mattogno debunks the gruesome nonsense about Dr. Mengele
(Dr. Mengele’s alleged “Medical Experiments” on Twins in the Birkenau Gypsy Camp)
http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2013/volume_5/number_4/dr_mengeles_medical_experiments_on_twins.php
The Making of a Monster: How Jews created the Mengele Legend

Other than Adolf Hitler, Josef Mengele may be the only figure from National-Socialist Germany targeted for demonization with an entire major motion-picture while he was still alive and at large. 
The Boys from Brazil in 1978, based on Ira Levin’s 1976 novel, portrays a “Josef Mengele” that is pure, crude caricature.
The worst of the accusations against Mengele is not that he carried out absurd pseudo-medical experiments, but that he was responsible for indicating who at Auschwitz would be gassed. The number typically attributed to him is 300-400 thousand.
But this is precisely the claim about Auschwitz that, since 1985, has been most conclusively disproven, thanks to Fred Leuchter, who has demonstrated that the supposed gas-chambers at Auschwitz are structurally unsuited for that purpose, thanks to Walter Lüftl the former chairman of the Austrian Chamber of Engineers, whose Lüftl Report points out that the properties of Zyklon-B as a fumigant make it unsuitable for use as described in the so-called eyewitness accounts, and to Germar Rudolf, who has checked the quantities of cyanide-residue in the putative gas-chambers. Above all, thanks to Professor Robert Faurisson, who had the idea of commissioning experts to examine the gas-chambers, and to Ernst Zündel, who recognized the merit of Faurisson’s idea and put it into action.

Dr. Mengele denied performing ghastly experiments on anybody
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/dr-mengele-denied-auschwitz-was-death.html

Josef Mengele: A New Look By Michael Murphy
http://barnesreview.org/pdf/TBR2004-no3.pdf

Mengele: The Complete Story A Review By Thomas Kues
http://codoh.com/library/document/484/

Lessons of the Mengele Affair
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v06/v06p377_Weber.html

Fake Mengele photo on H.E.A.R.T.’s website
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/fake-mengele-photo-on-hearts-website.html

AUSCHWITZ TATTOO HOAX

Of all the multifarious “symbols of the Holocaust”, probably no symbol is more powerful than the “Holocaust tattoos” of the “Holocaust survivors”. Wherever you find Jews, you find “survivors”; wherever you find “survivors”, you find “Holocaust tattoos”. 
One “survivor” at a public meeting of some sort has the same sort of effect on the audience as a shot of curare or displaying a crucifix in front of a vampire: the “tattoos” (and the sob-stories with which they are inevitably accompanied), have a paralyzing effect on almost everyone who sees them; yet, astonishingly enough, apart from the tattoos themselves, there is not the slightest proof that the National Socialists tattooed anyone, ever, at Auschwitz or anywhere else. Let us examine this matter dispassionately, in a bit more detail.
http://www.cwporter.com/tattoo1.htm
World’s Record for Continuous Tattooing: 178 Simple Tattoos in 35 1/2 hours!


I don’t know how long it takes to do a wisdom fish (perhaps this is the simple symbol for Christianity with which we are all familiar), but this is pretty much the way I imagine it must have been done at Auschwitz, if it was done at all, which I do not believe. The wisdom fish cannot be very complicated for 20 dollars; they would probably charge almost the same to do a 6-digit set of numbers. Note the number of tattoos and teamwork involved: 178 simple tattoos in 35 1/2 hours, using modern equipment and a team of two people. So one Jew at Auschwitz tattooes 200,000 people with two needles and a pot of ink?
Tattooing poses the risk of infection. Are we to believe this procedure was carried out despite the serious threat of typhus and even during or after the typhus outbreak in July of 1942? Tattooing leaves tiny open wounds on the skin. With typhus a person only need to scratch a bite to rub the contaminated lice faeces into the tiny wound on the skin to become infected. Were inmates allowed to wonder off around the camp and mix with other inmates after receiving the tattoo before the skin had healed?
Despite Jews only comprising less than 40% of prisoners at Auschwitz we never saw any non-Jewish prisoners displaying their tattoos for the world to see.

SOAP AND LAMPSHADES

Soap and Lampshades: The Lies Persist
http://codoh.com/library/document/628

Holy Soap
At the Nuremberg Trial, it was proven, that the Nazis made soap out of Jews. Its since been proven they didn’t make soap out of Jews.
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2010/11/soap.html

1941 article about fake WW1 soap lie
Brilliant article from September 1941, about the World War One propaganda lie, that Germans made people into soap.

“There wasn’t a word of truth in it”
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/1941-article-about-fake-ww1-soap-lie.html

HUMAN SOAP
“the classic lie of war propaganda”

Radha Binod Pal (1886 – 1967) was a judge at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, the Japanese version of the Nuremberg Witch Trials. He wrote a 700 page Dissenting Judgement of the trial which was banned in Britain and occupied-Japan. Pal made reference to the the World War I British propaganda lie that the Germans boiled down their dead to make pig food, which later morphed into them making soap. In 1925 the British Foreign Secretary admitted in Parliament, the story was untrue, in 1941 the Germans issued “propaganda” mickey-taking the British for it, even Americans were stating in 1941 “there wasn’t a word of truth in it”, but Jews still re-hashed it in World War II.

David Ben Gurion on the “soap factory”

Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion interviewed in the New York Times 1960 on the forthcoming Eichmann trial.

“I believe that through this trial all thinking people will come to realize that in our
day the gas chamber and the soap factory are what anti-Semitism may lead to.”
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/david-ben-gurion-on-soap-factory.html

MOST OUTRAGEOUS TALES OF THE HOLOHOAX

Please remember when you skim through this long list and read individual stories, that although most of this may appear completely outrageous, impossible and laughable, these stories and allegations were presented dead serious as nothing but the truth.

http://balder.org/judea/The-Most-Fantastic-Holocaust-Survivor-Stories-Jewish-Soap-Lampshades-Fertilizer-Mengele-Miracles.php

• Holocaust “eye-witness” whoppers
• Eddie Weinstein’s harrowing Holocaust story: Jews murdered in “death showers” w/ carbon monoxide, Survived gunshot through lung, no medical treatment
• Excerpts from “The Black Book” – Electrocution Chamber and Electric Crematorium at Belzec, rivers of blood, Jew bone powder used for construction, etc
• Inside the Auschwitz “Death Factory” – “Eyewitness” says boiling human fat collected in pans and poured over bodies in burning pits to stoke fire
• Max Edelman’s sad Holocaust™ tale: “Blind Jew in a Death Camp” – Miraculously survived 8 days without water, escaped being holocausted though blind
• Holyhoax survivor extraordinaire Thomas Blatt – At Sobibor “250,000 people roasted on huge pyres made from iron rails, and fuelled with diesel oil”
• Adolf Eichmann “witnessed” a Jew blood geyser
• Sobibor – The Germans “bred geese in order to drown out the shouts and torments of 250,000 Jews murdered inside the gas chambers” !!!
• Kazimir Tafilin’s holo-fable: escaped Auschwitz by climbing crematorium chimney; jumped from roof, bounced off ground, bones rattled when ran away
• Ernest and Judy Urman’s tale: “The Nazis had a gas chamber in Shanghai, China equipped to gas the city’s 20,000 Jewish refugees”
• Daniel Chanoch’s tale – At Mauthausen, “the Germans used to prepare soups cooked with human flesh for the prisoners”
• Leon Litvack’s tale – “Second generation Holocaust survivor” says his momma escaped Auschwitz gas chamber twice by climbing out a window
• Edie Eger’s tale – danced for Mengele, weighed 40 lbs at 17 yrs-old when liberated
• Mengele trained a dog to memorize classical music, and viciously attack Jews who played a note inaccurately
• Samuel Pisar’s holo fairytale – Survived 3 “death” camps – Escaped gas chamber by claiming he “was there only to wash the floor”
• Carol Sojcher’s tale – Survived 5 camps, weighed 45 pounds at 17 years-old when liberated, only member of entire family to survive Shoah
• “Leap into Darkness: Seven Years on the Run in Wartime Europe” by Leo Bretholz; Escaped Nazis 7 times, all over Europe, swam rivers, climbed Alps, etc
• Alicia Appleman-Jurman’s amazing tale – survived typhoid, saved from pile of corpses, survived two firing squads, lived in woods
• Daniel Blatman’s Holy Hoax tale: German civilians murdered Jews on death marches, burning them alive in barns
• More of Judith Perlaki’s tale – Ate soup w/ live mice in it, washed w/ soap made from dead Jews, stayed in Auschwitz for several months after liberation
• Regina Bialek’s tale: “Mengele rescued me from inside the gas chamber”
• Jenny Eisenstein’s sad tale – Sent to Auschwitz at 13 yrs old, lives 2 years in “death camp”, survives
• “Hannah: From Dachau to the Olympics and Beyond” – Another outlandish Holohoax Survivor™ story exposed as a fraud
• Thomas Buergenthal sent to Auschwitz at age 10 – Survives two years at “death” camp
• Oskar Klausenstock’s amazing Hollywood-esque fairytale – numerous miracles, treked hundreds of miles on foot to escape Nazis
• Lola Rein Kaufman’s holofable – hid with 3 other Jews in a 6ft x 4ft hole in the ground for 9 months
• Jorge Klainman’s Holyco$t fairytale: “The Seventh Miracle” – Survived being shot, crawled out of pit with 99 corpses
• Erna Rubinstein’s Auschwitz tale – Water, not gas, came out of showers – Escaped death from “an ocean of fire as fare as the eye could see”
• Mira Kimmelman’s story – Survived a 2 and a half week ride on cattle train and a two-day death march in 30 below zero temps
• Ruth Foster’s sad Holocaust™ fable – Jews snuck into mortuary to bite flesh from dead Jews’ buttocks & cut out livers
• Paul Kessler’s tale – Lived with mom for a year in 4×4 hole in ground covered with twigs and manure
• Kitty Hart Moxon’s tear-jerking Holohoax tale – Had to scrape Auschwitz toilets with bare hands; used same bowl for food and as a toilet; 3.6 million were holocausted in Auschwitz in just 8 months!!
• Ellen Litman’s amazing tale – Family escaped being holocausted by hiking across Alps “living on bread and milk left by shepherds”
• Joanna Sobolewska’s tale – “Rescued from Nazi death camp in 1923″….1-9-2-3
• Klaus Stern’s tale – “pulled from gas chamber line at last minute when SS guard saw his fat face and though he was too healthy to die”
• Jafa Wallach’s tale – Hid from the Germans with 3 other people in a 6×4 ft hole for 22 months
• Alex Levin’s sad tale – Lived in forest for 18 months when only 9-10 years old, ants kept his clothes clean
• Joe Diamond’s tale – Escaped being deathed in Auschwitz gas chamber by jumping out 20-ft high window and hiding in latrine
• Marsha Kreuzman’s tale – survived 5 concentration camps, was hug upside down for 7 hours
• Peter Wigmore’s tale – his mother surived Auschwitz gas chamber 3 times by being “pulled from the line by workers”
• Dina Babbitt’s sad tale – “survived Auschwitz only because Mengele commissioned her to produce paintings of Gypsies”
• Sol Lurie’s unbelievable tale – Went back to Germany in 1952, miraculously stumbled upon chain and good luck charm he lost during WWII
• A true Holocaust horror story – Sidney Glucksman “witnessed homicidal gas chambers, babies stuffed in bags & bashed against walls”
• Anita Schorr’s Holocaust® Tale – Escaped Auschwitz gas chamber by slipping into latrine unnoticed
• Rachel Levy’s tale – escaped the Auschwitz gas chamber by hiding behind people carrying soup
• Abraham Landau’s tale – “Survived 14 death camps, all other 95 members of his family holocausted”
• Mietek Grocher escapes Majdanek gas chamber by walking backwards while guards weren’t looking
• Holocaust speaker and author and alleged Auschwitz survivor, Gunther Skaletz, has event cancelled because his own family disputes his story
• Herman Rosenblat’s tale, the “Holocaust’s greatest love story”, exposed and admitted to be a hoax. Yet Holyhoaxer is unrepentent and maintains “It was not a lie…in my imagination it was true”
• Gena Turgel’s Holofraud tale: “I walked out of an Auschwitz gas chamber alive, camped with Anne Frank, and was experimented on by Mengele”
• Holyhoaxer Joseph Hirt, who had a his arm tattooed with a fake “Auschwitz number”, is exposed as a liar and admits he fabricated his entire story
• Chaim Ferster’s Holy Hoax yarn: “I survived eight death camps, saw flames coming out of the chimneys at Aushwitz, only water came out of the gas chamber”
• Holocaust Survivor Iby Knill finally tells of the horrors of the Holy Hoax at 90 years old after 70 years of silence !!!
• Ludwika Fiszer’s holy hoax tale – Miraculously survived machine gun pit at Poniatowa, climbed out naked and escaped, survived Polish winter

“EYEWITNESSES”

The judge asked the prosecutor if he would call any “survivors” to the witness stand. The prosecutor answered no. The experience of 1985 had been too embarrassing. The cross examination had been devastating. It is regrettable that at the trial of Klaus Barbie in France in 1987 and at the trial of John Demjanjuk in Israel in 1987-1988, no defense lawyer has followed Douglas Christie’s example in the first Zündel trial (1985): Christie had shown that by carefully questioning witnesses about the gassing process itself, one could destroy the very foundation of the “extermination camp” myth. — The Zündel Trials (1985 and 1988) by ROBERT FAURISSON 



“…most of the memoirs and reports [of ‘Holocaust survivors’] are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…” — Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950, Vol. 12, p. 65.


Bruno Baum, a former communist inmate in Auschwitz, was allowed to brag in summer 1945 in a Soviet newspaper: “The whole propaganda which started about Auschwitz abroad was initiated by us [German communist inmates] with the help of our Polish comrades.” (Deutsche Volkszeitung, Soviet paper in occupied East Germany, 31 July 1945). Thus, it is not surprising to learn that during several trials in Germany, it emerged that the testimony of witnesses from eastern Europe had been orchestrated by communist authorities. — THE HOLOCAUST CONTROVERSY The Case For Open Debate An Introduction by Germar Rudolf


Witnesses to the Gas Chambers of Auschwitz
By Robert Faurisson

Eyewitness testimony must always be verified. There are two essential means of verifying such testimony in criminal cases: confronting the account with the material elements (in particular, with expertise as to the crime weapon), and the detailed cross-examination of the witness on what he/she purports to have seen. Thus, in the proceedings where it had been a question of the homicidal gas chambers of Auschwitz, no judge nor any attorney was able to claim any kind of expertise regarding the weapon of the crime; moreover, no lawyer ever cross-examined the witnesses by asking them to describe with precision even one of these chemical slaughter-houses. That is, up until 1985. When witnesses that year were finally cross-examined on these subjects during the first Zündel trial in Toronto, their rout was total. Because of this resounding set-back and by reason of other calamities previous to or following 1985, the defenders of the thesis of Jewish extermination have begun to abandon a history of Auschwitz primarily founded on testimonies and are obliging themselves, at the present time, to replace it with a scientific basis, or, at least, one which appears scientific, founded on factual research and proofs. The ‘testimonial history’ of Auschwitz in the manner of Elie Wiesel and Claude Lanzmann is discredited. Its time has passed. It remains for the exterminationists to attempt to work like the Revisionists on the facts and the evidence.
http://codoh.com/library/document/935/

Eyewitnesses
http://www.whale.to/b/eye_witnesses.html

Holocaust Survivor Stories
http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/holocaust-survivor-stories.html

The unforgettable Moshe ‘gassed six times’ Peer
“Moshe Peer” is fairly notorious because of an article about him that appeared in the Montreal Gazette in 1993, which claimed that as a boy of 12, he’d survived six separate gassings at Bergen-Belsen, a camp in which homicidal gassing are not claimed by historians to have occured.
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/the-unforgettable-moshi-gassed-six.html

Gena Turgel’s Holofraud tale: “I walked out of an Auschwitz gas chamber alive, camped with Anne Frank, and was experimented on by Mengele”
http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/gena-turgels-holofraud-tale-i-walked.html

Holyhoax survivor extraordinaire Thomas Blatt – At Sobibor “250,000 people roasted on huge pyres made from iron rails, and fueled with diesel oil”
http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.co.uk/2010/01/thomas-blatts-tale-at-sobibor-250000.html

Anti-Zionist Jew Josef Ginsburg, whose father was a rabbi, testified as a defence witness in the second trial of Ernst Zündel in 1988. In his testimony Ginsburg stated that the false, sick statements made by “Holocaust survivors” would go down by 95.5% if they were made to swear a special Jewish oath, as the superficial oath made in a secular court of law was not morally binding for Jews.
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2011/08/how-to-make-jew-tell-truth.html



Kol Nidre Prayer – Judaism’s License To Lie
http://www.rense.com/general92/nidre.htm

A Jewish Prayer to Absolve All Vows
http://www.fpp.co.uk/BoD/origins/Kol_Nidre_debate.html

Kol Nidre Prayer
http://www.whale.to/c/kol_nidre_prayer.html

ELIE WIESEL: A PROMINENT FALSE WITNESS

Elie Wiesel Cons The World: 
A website dedicated to exposing the false testimony of the world’s most famous Holocaust survivor.
http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com/

Warren B. Routledge: Holocaust High Priest—Elie Wiesel, “Night,” the Memory Cult, and the Rise of Revisionism
http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=30

Documents on Elie Wiesel
http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Wiesel/index.html

Elie Wiesel
http://www.whale.to/b/wiesel_h.html



“Things are not that simple, Rebbe. Some events do take place but are not true; others are — although they never occurred.” – Elie Wiesel, The Legends of Our Time, p. 8



In All Rivers Run to the Sea: Memoirs (Schocken Books, 1996, p. 74), Elie Wiesel proclaims that his bizarre gas chamber cult is off-limits to investigators looking to verify the false claims that he, and his co-religionists, make, stating: “Let the gas chambers remain closed to prying eyes, and to imagination.”


Some anti-German hate speech from the “dignified humanitarian” Elie Wiesel:

“Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate — healthy, virile hate — for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German. To do otherwise would be a betrayal of the dead.” — Elie Wiesel, The Legends of Our Time

Elie Wiesel on raping German girls
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/elie-wiesel-on-raping-german-girls.html

The origin of Elie Wiesel’s German hatred
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/the-origin-of-elie-wiesels-german-hatred.html

1985, Wiesel’s fire pits still doing the rounds
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/1985-wiesels-fire-pits-still-doing.html

THE BBC’S OSKAR GROENING “I SAW THE GAS CHAMBERS” LIE

The BBC’s breathless coverage of Groening’s court date, as contained in their article of February 2, 2015, titled “Trialdate set for ‘Auschwitz bookkeeper’ Groening” is clearly designed to be an attempt to beat back the growing Holocaust revisionist tide.

The BBC article, in a sub-heading called “I saw the gas chambers,” tells its readers that:

“Groening, who began work at Auschwitz aged 21, does not deny witnessing the mass killing at Auschwitz. In 2005 he told the BBC: “I saw the gas chambers. I saw the crematoria. I saw the open fires. I was on the ramp when the selections [for the gas chambers] took place.”I would like you to believe these atrocities happened—because I was there.”

The documentary to which this article refers is the six-episode “Auschwitz: The Nazis and ‘The Final Solution’” produced by the BBC and distributed all over the world.  As usual with these sorts of Holocaust stories, the truth is very far from reality. Groening was a lower-ranking SS man at Auschwitz—but in the BBC documentary, he actually never used the words “gas chambers.” This is a complete fiction, a made-up insertion.


Oskar Gröning and his testimony – David Irving
Once again, we have a classic case of outright lies, combined with a “don’t-deny-it-happened-but-I-was-not-involved” type confession, the sort of which I detailed in Chapter 8: The Psychology of Confessions in The Six Million: Fact or Fiction. Critically, Groening talked about his time at the camp, but denies ever having committed any murders or atrocities himself. Equally critically, he would of course have seen crematoria, and cremations—these were installations at every single German concentration camp. The existence of crematoria does not, however, “prove” a mass extermination program, and it is clear that Groening was talked into making his remarks in some type of belief that he would not be prosecuted if he admitted being at the camp. Now, however, he will soon regret having been willing to comment at all, because his appearance on the BBC documentary, and his resultant “fame” has landed him in court facing no less than 300,000 murder charges. The only logical—and best—defense against this incredible charge, is of course to show that there were no mass exterminations. However, unfortunately for Groening—and he has played along with the game, never thinking it would land him in court—this obvious, and only, real defense is illegal in Germany.
Oskar Groening and the Erect Penises of Auschwitz
http://peterwinterwriting.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/the-bbcs-oskar-groening-i-saw-gas.html

THE ANNE FRANK DIARY FRAUD

In 1980, because of a lawsuit in a German court, the German state forensic bureau, the Bundes Kriminal Amt [BKA], forensically examined the original “diary” manuscript. Their analysis determined that “significant” portions of the work were written with a ballpoint pen. Since ballpoint pens were not available before 1951, portions of the work were added well after the war (Anne Frank died in March 1945).

The BKA also determined that none of the “diary” handwriting matched known examples of Anne’s handwriting. Earlier handwriting experts had determined that all of the writing in the “diary” was by the same hand. Therefore, the entire “diary” was a postwar fake.
The true author of the diary was Jewish novelist Meyer Levin, who demanded and was awarded $50,000 in payment for his work in a court action against Anne’s father, Otto Frank.
http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/diary-of-anne-frank-is-fraud.html


Anne Frank Diary Co-Authored by Father
The Basel, Switzerland, Anne Frank Fonds (Anne Frank Fund)—which controls the copyright to the Diary of Anne Frank—has admitted that the book was in fact at least co-authored by Otto Frank, Anne’s father, after the war.  The admission proves that the book, which is still heavily promoted as a “holocaust memoir,” is in fact largely a postwar fabrication which contained parts of the young Anne’s diary with extensive additions added by her father.
http://peterwinterwriting.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/anne-frank-diary-co-authored-by-father.html

The Diary of Anne Frank: Is it Genuine?
By Robert Faurisson
http://codoh.com/library/document/2938

Anne Frank’s Diary –
Some Honest Questions
http://www.rense.com/general65/aan.htm

‘Anna Frank’s Novel: The Diary is a Fraud’
http://www.heretical.com/sgs-1998/afn.html

Anne Frank FAQ
http://www.heretical.com/sgs-1999/frank6.html

ATROCITY PROPAGANDA: 

ALLIED PHOTO FORGERIES OF “GERMAN ATROCITIES”

Photo manipulations in the USSR
http://englishrussia.com/2012/09/06/photo-manipulations-in-the-ussr/

Holocaust Propaganda Photographs
http://www.whale.to/b/holocaust_prop_p.html


Letters to David Irving: Photo Forgeries
http://www.fpp.co.uk/Letters/hate_08/Splitcane_010108.html
http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/fake/SWCsmokeFake.html
http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/fake/USHMMDachauFake.html


Udo Walendy: Forged War Crimes Malign The German Nation
Udo Walendy examines the alleged visual documents—photographs—that are claimed to prove the atrocities perpetrated by the National Socialists against the Jews. The question at issue is what exactly the pictures show, whether they were retouched or whether they may even be completely fabricated, i.e., montages or drawings. A pile of dead bodies or an open mass grave, for example, can be presented as evidence for the gas chamber murders, but what is there to prove that the pictures do not in fact show the German victims of Allied air-raids, or the victims of starvation or epidemics in German or Allied camps, soldiers killed in action, victims of pogroms, or even persons killed by the Soviet secret service? Udo Walendy shows with numerous examples that the falsification of photographs for purposes of incriminating the Third Reich is rather more the rule than the exception. It is astonishing to note that there are usually many different versions of a forged photograph, which makes it easy to spot cases of alteration. Walendy shows that the photo documents analyzed by him cannot be incontestable evidence for the claims usually associated with them.
PDF: http://archive.org/details/ForgedWarCrimesMalignTheGermanNation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/151615857/Forged-War-Crimes-Malign-the-German-Nation


Fake Film Documentaries – ‘Nazi’ Concentration Camps on Staten Island
“As senior director for the popular movie house newsreel, he often created world events with actors and movie sets. One such news feature film, Inside Nazi Germany, made in 1938, included footage of a “concentration camp” that was filmed on Staten Island with scores of New York City actors. Much of the film’s footage was shot within the borders of the Third Reich by a free-lance cameraman, but [Louis] Rochement [Glenn’s producer] felt that the film had been censored by the German authorities and ordered Glenn to re-enact widely reported Nazi camp atrocities.”
http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/fake/GlennObit.html


In November 1941, the British government decided that there were not enough dramatic photographs of Nazi atrocities. The BSC arranged for a studio in Canada to create such photographs using actors, stage-sets, costumes, and dummies for the manufacture of war scenes in which actors dressed up as Nazi soldiers were shown mass-murdering innocent people. These photos were widely circulated in the United States.
– Desperate Deception: British Covert Operations in the United States, 1939-44

WWII UK and US PSYOPS Exposed

The following book details how the BRIZIS and YANKIZ set up a fake German Concentration Camp on Staten Island to create “news reel” footage depicting “Nazi atrocities” with which to get the American public to support the war against Germany. This was done in Canada too where fake photos and were created, all to demonize the Germans! But of course, it didn’t stop there when the war ended. Do you recall seeing all this “Nazi atrocity” stuff that they taught you in history class?
http://justice4germans.com/2012/10/31/wwii-uk-and-us-psyops-exposed-still-think-goebbels-and-hitler-were-the-big-fat-liars/


Dino A Brugioni: Photo Fakery: The History and Techniques of Photographic Deception and Manipulation
Dino A. Brugioni was one of the founders of the CIA’s National Photographic Interpretation Center. He also co-authored the CIA’s “Retrospective Analysis of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Extermination Complex.” In the “About the Author” section of this book it notes that he “became the CIA expert in photo fakery and photo manipulation.” Of course this topic is of interest to revisionists. It is doubly interesting in that the self-admitted CIA expert in photo fakery is also the one who wrote the CIA’s report based on aerial photos to prove the Holocaust.
http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/fake/Brugioni1.html


German bodies from the Rhine meadow camps presented as Jewish bodies
http://www.hist-chron.com/eu/D/1945-rheinwiesenlager/ENGL/003-giant-Lie-german-bodies-presented-as-Jewish-bodies.html

Stalin’s “Torch-men-Order” #0428 confirmed by Russia

The so-called “torch-men order” (Fackelmännerbefehl) is the command No. 0428, issued November 17th, 1941 by Stalin. It declares that Russian partisans in German uniforms, particularly those of the Waffen-SS, were to destroy all settlements within a swathe of about 40 – 60 km depth from the main battle lines and to ruthlessly kill the civilian population. With these tactics it was important to leave a few survivors, which would report the supposed German terror attacks. This method of warfare was also confirmed by German soldiers who captured many Russian partisans wearing German uniforms.

The Stawka headquarters of the highest commands orders:
All settlements, in which German troops are found, up to a depth of 40 – 60km from the main lines of battle, are to be destroyed and set on fire, also 20-30km from the roads. For the destruction of the settled areas in the required radius, the air force will be made available, also artillery and rocket-launchers will be used extensively, as well as intelligence units, skiers and Partisan divisions, who are equipped with bottles with flammable liquid. These hunting expeditions in their activities of destruction are to be dressed to the greatest extent in German soldier’s uniforms and uniforms of the Waffen-SS looted from the German army.

This will ignite hatred toward all fascist occupiers and make the conscription of partisans from the outlaying areas of fascist territories easier. It is important to have survivors who will tell about “German atrocities”. For this purpose every regiment is to form hunter-units of about 20- 30 men strong with the task to detonate and incinerate the villages. We have to select brave fighters for this action of destruction of settled areas. These men will be especially recommended to receive bravery awards when working in German uniforms behind enemy lines and destroying those settlement outposts. Among the population we have to spread the rumor that the Germans are burning the villages in order to punish the Partisans.

(Archive Series 429, Rolle 461, General’s Headquarters of the Army, Division, foreign Units East II H 3/70 Fr 6439568. Filed: National Archive Washington) [1] [in progress] “Fackelmänner Befehl” (torch men-order) confirmed. Russian Security Service FSB published Stalin’s order No. 0428.

HOLOCAUST DENIAL LAWS: THE TRUTH IS NO DEFENSE – EVIDENCE INADMISSABLE, DEFENSE FORBIDDEN

German courts are forbidden by orders from higher up to accept such motions to introduce evidence, as is stated in Article 97 of the German Basic Law: “Judges are independent and subject only to the Law.”

Germany’s Basic Law, which was negotiated between German politicians and primarily the U.S. occupational forces right after WWII, is considered to be its constitution, although formally seen it has never been approved by a referendum of the German people, hence lacks formal legitimacy.
One hideous feature of German legal standards is that, when it comes to “the Holocaust,” it pits human dignity against the right to search for the truth. According to this “logic,” the human dignity of all Jews – those who suffered back then and those who live today – depends on everyone accepting the orthodox Holocaust narrative. And since the protection of human dignity is the first and most important article in the German constitution, this has priority over everything else.
What I pointed out first in court was the fact that denying us the search for the truth is an even more serious violation of human dignity than denying the Jews a certain narrative of a detail of their history. After all: what sets us humans apart from bacteria and insects? Isn’t it the capacity to doubt our senses and to systematically search for the reality behind the mere semblance.
Resistance Is Obligatory – Germar Rudolf

In Germany, if a person is taken to court on the charge of Holocaust Denial a truly Orwellian law exists that it is illegal to submit evidence to the court that refutes the alleged gas chambers or any other aspect of the Holocaust narrative. It is illegal for the defendant to defend their position. If the defendant attempts to defend their position in court the defendant will be found guilty of Holocaust Denial and further fines or years of imprisonment will be added to the defendant’s punishment for attempting to defend his or her position. If the defendant’s lawyer attempts to defend their client’s position the lawyer will also be charged and convicted of Holocaust Denial as happened to German lawyer Sylvia Stolz.
The truth is no defense. In Germany you can go to jail for telling an audience what the curator of the Auschwitz Museum said about Auschwitz. Can you call the curator as a witness? No. The truth is no defense. One can go to prison for reporting scientific findings regarding the alleged homicdal gas chambers. Is science a defense? No. They criminalize the honest practice of science. It is a crime to speak the truth.

German Laws for the Suppression of Free Speech

The precedence of individual rights and the distinction between the expression of opinion and claims of fact underlie the prohibition of the so-called Auschwitz-Lüge (Auschwitz Lie). The expression was first coined by right-wing extremists and anti-Semites both in Germany and elsewhere to deny the systematic mass murder of European Jewry in Auschwitz and other concentration camps under the Nazis. The “lie,” they maintain, was invented by Jews to defame Germans and to exploit them financially. In the meantime, the expression has acquired a broader meaning and now serves as a shorthand description of assertions denying that the Holocaust occurred.
The Criminal Code, in its Sections 185, 189 and 194, prohibits the defamation and denigration of the character of deceased persons and make such denigration punishable by law. The statement that Jews were not persecuted during National Socialism is clearly false. The mass murder of Jews in the gas chambers of the Third Reich is a historical fact that has been proven by countless witness statements and documents, numerous court rulings and extensive historical research.
In dealing with denial of the Holocaust, criminal law clearly finds itself in conflict with the right to express one’s opinion. While recognizing that prohibiting the “Lüge” represents a limitation of the right to free expression, German jurisprudence holds that the injury to the personal honor of those defamed (Jewish citizens) weighs so heavily that it takes precedence over freedom of expression.
In a ruling issued in April 1994, the Federal Constitutional Court confirmed that Holocaust revisionism is not protected under the Basic Law’s guarantee of freedom of opinion. “In weighing the importance of free speech against that of individual rights, courts must consider on the one hand the severity of the offense caused by Holocaust denial to the Jewish population in light of the suffering inflicted upon it by Germany. On the other hand, the opinion expressed is not particularly deserving of protection,” the constitutional court judges wrote, “stemming as it does from a claim of fact that has been proven untrue. This court has consistently protected the personal honor of those defamed above the right of others to make patently false statements.”

The Auschwitz-Lüge may also be prosecuted under Section 130 of the Criminal Code, which makes incitement (Volksverhetzung) a punishable offense. The current German legal interpretation of incitement protects public peace and human dignity. The constitutional foundation of the Federal Republic of Germany recognizes no interest that could justify injuring the personal honor and dignity of some of its citizens and promoting enmity and hatred toward them. Germany is not, incidentally, the only nation that considers denial of the Holocaust to be beyond the limits of free speech. France passed a law in 1990 that makes it a criminal offense to dispute the facts of the Holocaust as recognized by French courts or the 1945 international war crimes tribunal held in Nuremberg. A similar law exists in Italy.

Sylvia Stolz “The Reality of Freedom of Expression”
In this video, Sylvia Stolz, who has been called the German Joan of Arc, discusses her experiences as a trial lawyer defending Ernst Zündel and others who have been charged with holocaust denial. A question that people have been asking for a long time is that if the holocaust is based upon such solid evidence, and can withstand historical scrutiny, then why is it against the law to question it, as indeed is the case in France, Germany, and certain other countries?
But the picture of just how repressive things can get in countries where laws like this are on the books is darker and more Kafkaesque than most of us realize. Stolz describes the arbitrary and coercive parameters set by the German legal system when defense attorneys  attempt to submit evidence or mount a rational, reasoned defense of their clients. In cases where defendants are charged with holocaust denial, normal judicial procedures and rules of evidence are in essence tossed out the window, making a legal defense practically impossible. What comes through loud and clear from Stolz’s talk is the complete, utter insanity of holocaust denial laws. Here is a bit from the video description:
In the speech, Stolz discusses her experiences as a defence lawyer for so-called Holocaust deniers in Germany, and describes the Orwellian system of state-enforced repression there which denies defendants (and their lawyers!) the right to explain themselves under threat of additional charges for the “repeat offence” of expressing a forbidden idea, even in their own defence in a court of law. Stolz further relates how the subject of the Holocaust itself has never been clearly or adequately defined by the German courts through the normal channel of judicial findings-of-fact in precedent decisions. Instead, the courts have relied on the arbitrary doctrine that the facts of the Holocaust are “self-evident” and thus in no need of proof, despite the obvious objection that the arguments of the “deniers” themselves clearly demonstrate that those facts are indeed contestable and thus cannot be “self-evident” by definition.
In the face of such abuses and absurdities, other lawyers might throw up their hands and simply walk away: Sylvia Stolz has the courage to call injustice what it is, and take a stand. Her speech is an extraordinary document of our times, a deeply moving call “to think what is true, to feel what is beautiful, and to want what is good.” Wherever you may fall along the ideological spectrum, if you believe in freedom of expression, this speech is a must.
Stolz has been arrested, jailed and stripped of her license to practice law. And on February 25, 2015 she was sentenced to 20 months in prison for “racial incitation”… on the basis of statements she made in this speech. The talk was given on November 24, 2012.

Holocaust skeptic Vincent Reynouard sentenced to two years prison in France

In light of all the ‘Je Suis Charlie’ free speech hoopla, the French regime just confirmed their fraudulent stance on the issue by sentencing a man, Vincent Reynouard, to two years in jail for his non-violent historical opinions concerning the ‘Holocaust.’ The ‘free speech’ sham continues in the Talmudic Republic of France.
In France, Holocaust revisionists are now treated as dangerous criminals


Vincent Reynouard, condemned for having the wrong view of history as it pertains to WWII and “Holocaust,” has now been refused a bank account. Is not the right to have a bank account a basic right of citizenship, necessary for carrying on one’s business in modern society … and not a privilege to be taken away for political reasons? This signals that questioning the “Holocaust” is intended to be utterly stamped out, not just discouraged. Also that the private sector is being forced to carry out the policies of the political governmental sector. And it also signals that Vincent Reynouard’s work in this field is effective, ie. successful, and as he is a younger man than Robert Faurisson and not likely to pass from the scene soon on his own — he must be stopped. Reynouard rightly speaks of a religous taboo, saying that “in our modern secularized societies, the Hitlerian “gas chamber” has become a religious taboo. He cites a columnist writing for L’Express: “Holocaust denial is not a hypothesis [to be debated]; Holocaust drew a line beyond which doubt is a crime.”  Imagine that this is accepted in a supposedly Democratic society!


Why ‘Holocaust Denial’ Laws are Dangerous

Justice applied selectively is not justice. It is a form of injustice. Because “denial” laws prohibit dissident views about only one chapter of history, they are inherently unfair. They inhibit historical inquiry and restrict free speech.“Holocaust denial” laws are the result of a well-organized, long-term Jewish campaign. In 1982, the Institute for Jewish Affairs in London, a London-based agency of the World Jewish Congress, announced that it was launching a worldwide campaign to persuade and pressure governments to outlaw “Holocaust denial.” The anti-revisionist laws that were subsequently enacted in several European countries reflect the success of this initiative. Germany enacted its “Holocaust denial” statute in 1985 (amended in 1994), France in 1990, Austria in 1992, Belgium in 1995, and Slovakia in 2001. Underscoring the organized nature of this campaign, the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists in June 1998 called for new and more severe laws against “Holocaust denial.”
The ‘Holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

GENERAL REVISIONIST ARTICLES

The Great Holocaust Mystery: Reconsidering the Evidence by Thomas Dalton

The Holocaust is the greatest murder-mystery of the 20th century. Six million Jews, we are told, perished at the hands of the Nazis—in gas chambers, ghettos, and concentration camps. They were starved, suffocated, and shot. Their bodies were buried in mass graves, or burned in the ovens of Auschwitz, or on open flames. And all simply because they were Jews. It was the embodiment of evil, the greatest crime ever perpetrated.
Traditional historians claim to know about this crime in great detail. They have documents, photographs, and hard evidence. They have incriminating testimony from key Nazis. Some of the gas chambers have survived. And they have innumerable Jewish eyewitnesses. According to some, it is the “most well-documented event in history.”1
And yet, when we ask detailed and pointed questions, our historians fall short. They don’t really know when, where, or how the Jews died. They have no technical explanation of how it was possible, for example, to gas thousands of people per day in a single room, and then to dispose of their bodies—such that not a trace remains. They cannot find the mass graves that allegedly held thousands of bodies. They cannot explain wartime aerial photographs that show a disturbingly calm Auschwitz camp. And they refuse to even consider a raft of contradictory evidence. In fact, many aspects of the traditional story simply don’t add up. The deeper we look, the more puzzling the picture becomes—and hence, the great mystery.
As with any murder, we, as investigators, would like to examine several aspects of the crime; these would include the motive, the means by which it was conducted, and the bodies of the victims. We would furthermore like to consider all ancillary and related evidence that might support, or refute, the traditional story. As we will see, all these areas are problematic, from the conventional standpoint.

Why I Call Myself a Holocaust Denier by Paul Eisen

My family were ordinary folk – ‘twice-a-year Jews’ we used to call them. But like most of us second and third generation, upwardly mobile, North London Jews, our Jewishness filled our lives. And, at that time, that meant Zionism and the Holocaust. For me, my family and our friends, a post-Holocaust Israel meant quite simply ‘never again’.
But, while seemingly ordinary, my family was also rather extraordinary. My father was unusually tolerant and free-thinking, and my mother too was unusually lively in her thinking. A born rebel, there was nothing she loved more than to burst a balloon. As for me, I started off, first as the family tsaddik – awfully concerned with God and my Jewishness (though always strangely at odds with other Jews) – then the family dissident-intellectual. By young adulthood, you would have found me somewhere on the Zionist left – unquestioning in my support for the Jewish state but wishing it would not behave quite so badly and stop embarrassing me in front of my friends. However, when it came to the Holocaust, my faith was unwavering….
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=64860

But how could the Holocaust not be true? by Paul Eisen

How could the Holocaust not be true?  How could such a delusion and deception have taken place?  How could all those survivors be so wrong in their testimonies?  How could all those perpetrators be so wrong in their confessions?  How could all those documents, unspecific as they are, have been falsified?  Arthur Butz called his groundbreaking revisionist study “The Hoax of the Twentieth Century”, but a hoax of this size and nature just defies belief.  Conspiracy theories rarely convince, nor do those who propagate them, so surely the sheer absurdity of the revisionists’ claim tells us all we need to know.  So, if revisionism is to have any credibility at all, it must demonstrate how, if false, the Holocaust narrative, as we know it, came to be.
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=80479

A Brief History of how the Masters of Make-Believe made the world believe in Death Camps - Auschwitz as we know it is a Hollywood creation

Today’s Hollywood Jews are the heirs of the original crop of wartime Hollywood producers and directors who were called into service by the U.S. Army to “document” the concentration camps. Although they were not allowed into Auschwitz-Birkenau or Majdanek which were under the tight control of the Soviet Union, they actually had better film-making opportunities at the camps located in Germany proper which had suffered from intense American bombardment. With supply lines and infrastructure smashed to pieces, horrific scenes in these camps caused by hunger, poor hygiene and disease were not hard to find in 1945.
To tell the story, let’s go back to the beginning when George C. Marshall, U.S. Army Chief of Staff, called upon award-winning Hollywood director Frank Capra to head a special section on morale to explain to soldiers “why the hell they’re in uniform.” Marshall explained to Capra that these were not to be “propaganda films like those created by the Nazis and Japan, but sensitive and objective troop information films.” That, however, they were not.
http://jan27.org/news-views-70th-anniversary-commemoration/

The Revisionists’ Total Victory on the Historical and Scientific Level
By Robert Faurisson

Robert Faurisson

“The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.” – Robert Faurisson

In France and in the rest of the world historians and specialists of “the Holocaust” no longer know what to answer to the revisionists’ arguments. And to speak only of my own case, which has been going on since 1978 (that is, for some thirty-seven years), never has my country’s justice system, despite the tireless requests by self-righteous associations to rule against me on the substance of my writings or statements, been able to note therein the least trace of any rashness, negligence, deliberate ignorance, falsehood, falsification or lying.

My adversaries, rich and powerful though they may be, have never succeeded in getting our judges to convict me on the merits of the conclusions reached through my research work which, for over half a century, has focused on what is commonly called “the genocide of the Jews”, “the Nazi gas chambers” and “the six million (or nearly)” Jewish victims of the Third Reich. At most, at the end countless cases I have lost suits (whether as plaintiff or defendant) or been found guilty mainly 1) for a malevolence, supposed but not demonstrated, towards the Jews, 2) for breaking the gayssotine (the Fabius-Gayssot or Faurisson Act, legislation of convenience specifically targeting the findings of my research) or 3) by virtue of the “good faith” (sic) of individuals like Léon Poliakov or Robert Badinter, even though found to be at fault by the judges themselves…
http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/the-revisionists-total-victory-on.html

Source
https://web.archive.org/web/20200305133914/https://graviolat.blogspot.com/2020/01/an-introduction-to-holocaust-revisionism.html
___


Part 1

Backups
_