"Spiritually and Physically Responsible"
From its' inception, many rabbis warned of the potential dangers of Zionism and openly declared that all Jews loyal to G-d should stay away from it like one would from fire.
They made their opinions clear to their congregants and to the general public. Their message was that Zionism is a chauvinistic racist phenomenon which has absolutely naught to do with Judaism. They publicly expressed that Zionism would definitely be detrimental to the well being of Jews and Gentiles and that its effects on the Jewish religion would be nothing other than destructive.
Further, it would taint the reputation of Jewry as a whole and would cause utter confusion in the Jewish and non-Jewish communities. Judaism is a religion. Judaism is not a race or a nationality. That was and still remains the consensus amongst the rabbis.
We were given the Holy Land by G-d in order to be able to study and practice the Torah without disturbance and to attain levels of holiness difficult to attain outside of the Holy Land. We abused the privilege and we were expelled. That is exactly what all Jews say in their prayers on every Jewish festival, "Umipnay chatoenu golinu mayartsaynu" - "Because of our sins we were expelled from our land".
We have been forsworn by G-d "not to enter the Holy Land as a body before the predestined time", "not to rebel against the nations", to be loyal citizens, not to do anything against the will of any nation or its honour, not to seek vengeance, discord, restitution or compensation; "not to leave exile ahead of time." On the contrary; we have to be humble and accept the yoke of exile. To violate the oaths would result in "your flesh will be made prey as the deer and the antelope in the forest," and the redemption will be delayed.
(Talmud Tractate Ksubos p. 111a).
To violate the oaths is not only a sin, it is a heresy because it is against the fundamentals of our Belief. Only through complete repentance will the Almighty alone, without any human effort or intervention, redeem us from exile. This will be after G-d will send the prophet Elijah and Moshiach who will induce all Jews to complete repentance. At that time there will be universal peace.
All of the leading Jewish religious authorities of that era predicted great hardship to befall humanity generally and the Jewish People particularly, as a result of Zionism. To be a Jew means that either one is born to a Jewish mother or converts to the religion with the condition that he or she make no reservations with regard to Jewish Law. Unfortunately there are many Jews who have no inkling whatsoever as to the duties of a Jew. Many of them are not to blame, for in many cases they lacked a Jewish education and upbringing. But there are those who deliberately distort the teachings of our tradition to suit their personal needs.
It is self understood that not just anyone has the right or the ability to make a decision regarding the philosophy or law of a religion. Especially matters in which that person has no qualification. It follows then that those individuals who "decided" that Judaism is a nationality are to be ignored and even criticized.
It is no secret that the founders of Zionism had never studied Jewish Law nor did they express interest in our holy tradition. They openly defied Rabbinical authority and self-appointed themselves as leaders of the Jewish "nation". In Jewish history, actions like those have always spelled disaster.
To be a Jew and show open defiance of authority or to introduce "amendment" or "innovation" without first consulting with those officially appointed as Jewish spiritual leaders is the ideal equation to equal catastrophe. One can not just decide to "modernize" ancient traditions or regulations. The spiritual leaders of contemporary Judaism better known as Orthodox rabbis have received ordination to judge and interpret matters pertaining to the Jewish faith. These rabbis have received their rights and responsibilities and form a link in the unbroken chain of the Jewish tradition dating all the way back to Moses who received the Torah from Almighty G-d Himself. It was these very rabbis who, at the time of the formation of the Zionist movement, foresaw the pernicious outcome that was without a doubt lined up.
It was a man possessing outstanding Judaic genius, and a level of uncontested holiness who enunciated the Jewish stance regarding Zionism. This charismatic individual, the Rebbe of Satmar, Grand Rabbi Joel Teitelbaum, did not mince any words. Straight to the point he called Zionism "the work of Satan", "a sacrilege" and "a blasphemy". He forbade any participation with anything even remotely associated with Zionism and said that Zionism was bound to call the wrath of G-d upon His people.
He maintained this stance with unwavering bravery from the onset of Zionism whilst he was still in Hungary up until his death in New York where he lead a congregation numbering in the hundreds of thousands. Grand Rabbi Teitelbaum, scion to a legacy of holy mystics and Hassidic Masters unfortunately had his prediction fulfilled. We lost more than six million of our brothers, sisters, sons and daughters in a very horrible manner.
This, more than six million holy people had to experience as punishment for the Zionist stupidity. The Holocaust, he wept, was a direct result of Zionism, a punishment from G-d.
IT IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE THAT ALL THE SAGES AND SAINTS IN EUROPE AT THE TIME OF HITLER'S RISE DECLARED THAT HE WAS A MESSENGER OF DIVINE WRATH, SENT TO CHASTEN THE JEWS BECAUSE OF THE BITTER APOSTASY OF ZIONISM AGAINST THE BELIEF IN THE EVENTUAL MESSIANIC REDEMPTION.
But it doesn't end there.
It wasn't enough for the Zionist leaders to have aroused the wrath of G-d. They made a point of displaying abysmal contempt for their Jewish brothers and sisters by actively participating in their extermination. Just the idea alone of Zionism, which the rabbis had informed them would cause havoc, was not enough for them. They made an effort to pour fuel on an already burning flame. They had to incite the Angel of Death, Adolf Hitler. They took the liberty of telling the world that they represented World Jewry. Who appointed these individuals as leaders of the Jewish People??
It is no secret that these so-called "leaders" were ignoramuses when it came to Judaism. Atheists and racists too. These are the "statesmen" who organized the irresponsible boycott against Germany in 1933. This boycott hurt Germany like a fly attacking an elephant - but it brought calamity upon the Jews of Europe. At a time when America and England were at peace with the mad-dog Hitler, the Zionist "statesmen" forsook the only plausible method of political amenability; and with their boycott incensed the leader of Germany to a frenzy. Genocide began, but these people, if they can really be classified as members of the human race, sat back.
"No Shame"
President Roosevelt convened the Evian conference July 6-15 1938, to deal with the Jewish refugee problem. The Jewish Agency delegation headed by Golda Meir (Meirson) ignored a German offer to allow Jews to emigrate to other countries for $250 a head, and the Zionists made no effort to influence the United States and the 32 other countries attending the conference to allow immigration of German and Austrian Jews.
[Source]
On Feb 1, 1940 Henry Montor executive vice-President of the United Jewish Appeal refused to intervene for a shipload of Jewish refugees stranded on the Danube river, stating that "Palestine cannot be flooded with... old people or with undesirables."
[Source]
It is an historical fact that in 1941 and again in 1942, the German Gestapo offered all European Jews transit to Spain, if they would relinquish all their property in Germany and Occupied France; on condition that:
a) none of the deportees travel from Spain to Palestine; and b) all the deportees be transported from Spain to the USA or British colonies, and there to remain; with entry visas to be arranged by the Jews living there; and c) $1000.00 ransom for each family to be furnished by the Agency, payable upon the arrival of the family at the Spanish border at the rate of 1000 families daily.
The Zionist leaders in Switzerland and Turkey received this offer with the clear understanding that the exclusion of Palestine as a destination for the deportees was based on an agreement between the Gestapo and the Mufti.
The answer of the Zionist leaders was negative, with the following comments:
a) ONLY Palestine would be considered as a destination for the deportees. b) The European Jews must accede to suffering and death greater in measure than the other nations, in order that the victorious allies agree to a "Jewish State" at the end of the war. c) No ransom will be paid This response to the Gestapo's offer was made with the full knowledge that the alternative to this offer was the gas chamber.
These treacherous Zionist leaders betrayed their own flesh and blood. Zionism was never an option for Jewish salvation. Quite the opposite, it was a formula for human beings to be used as pawns for the power trip of several desperadoes. A perfidy! A betrayal beyond description!
In 1944, at the time of the Hungarian deportations, a similar offer was made, whereby all Hungarian Jewry could be saved. The same Zionist hierarchy again refused this offer (after the gas chambers had already taken a toll of millions).
The British government granted visas to 300 rabbis and their families to the Colony of Mauritius, with passage for the evacuees through Turkey. The "Jewish Agency" leaders sabotaged this plan with the observation that the plan was disloyal to Palestine, and the 300 rabbis and their families should be gassed.
On December 17, 1942 both houses of the British Parliament declared its readiness to find temporary refuge for endagered persons. The British Parliament proposed to evacuate 500,000 Jews from Europe, and resettle them in British colonies, as a part of diplomatic negotiations with Germany. This motion received within two weeks a total of 277 Parliamentary signatures. On Jan. 27, when the next steps were being pursued by over 100 M.P.'s and Lords, a spokesman for the Zionists announced that the Jews would oppose the motion because Palestine was ommitted.
[Source]
On Feb. 16, 1943 Roumania offered 70,000 Jewish refugees of the Trans-Dniestria to leave at the cost of $50 each. This was publicized in the New York papers.
Yitzhak Greenbaum, Chairman of the Rescue Committee of the Jewish Agency, addressing the Zionist Executive Council in Tel Aviv Feb. 18 1943 said, "when they asked me, "couldn't you give money out of the United Jewish Appeal funds for the rescue of Jews in Europe, I said NO! and I say again, NO!...one should resist this wave which pushes the Zionist activities to secondary importance." On Feb. 24, 1943 Stephen Wise, President of the American Jewish Congress and leader of the American Zionists issued a public refusal to this offer and declared no collection of funds would seem justified. In 1944, the Emergency Committee to Save the Jewish People called upon the American government to establish a War Refugee Board. Stephen Wise testifying before a special committeeof Congress objected to this proposal. [Source]
During the course of the negotiations mentioned above, Chaim Weizman, the first "Jewish statesman" stated: "The most valuable part of the Jewish nation is already in Palestine, and those Jews living outside Palestine are not too important". Weizman's cohort, Greenbaum, amplified this statement with the observation "One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Europe".
And then, after the bitterest episode in Jewish history, these Zionist "statesmen" lured the broken refugees in the DP camps to remain in hunger and deprivation, and to refuse relocation to any place but Palestine; only for the purpose of building their State.
In 1947 Congressman William Stration sponsored a bill to immediately grant entry to the United States of 400,000 displaced persons. The bill was not passed after it was publicly denounced by the Zionist leadership.
[Source]
These facts are read with consternation and unbearable shame. How can it be explained that at a time during the last phase of the war, when the Nazis were willing to barter Jews for money, partly because of their desires to establish contact with the Western powers which, they believed, were under Jewish influence, how was it possible one asks that the self-proclaimed "Jewish leaders" did not move heaven and earth to save the last remnant of their brothers?
On Feb. 23, 1956 the Hon. J. W. Pickersgill, Minister for Immigration was asked in the Canadian House of Commons "would he open the doors of Canada to Jewish refugees". He replied "the government has made no progress in that direction because the government of Israel....does not wish us to do so".
[Source]
In 1972, the Zionist leadership successfully opposed an effort in the United States Congress to allow 20,000-30,000 Russian refugees to enter the United States.
Jewish relief organizations, Joint and HIAS, were being pressured to abandon these refugees in Vienna, Rome and other Europiean cities. [Source]
The pattern is clear!!! Humanitarian rescue efforts are subverted to narrow Zionist interests.
There were many more shocking crimes committed by these abject degenerates known as "Jewish statesmen", we could list many more example, but for the time being let anyone produce a valid excuse for the above facts.
Zionist responsibility for the Holocaust is threefold.
Zionists Offer a Military Alliance with Hitler
It would be wishful thinking if it could be stated that the leaders of the Zionist movement sat back and ignored the plight of their dying brothers and sisters. Not only did they publicly refuse to assist in their rescue, but they actively participated with Hitler and the Nazi regime.
Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German port of Bremerhaven. Its stern bore the Hebrew letter for its name, "Tel Aviv", while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast. And although the ship was Zionist owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party (Nazi) member. Many years later a traveler aboard the ship recalled this symbolic combination as a "metaphysical absurdity". Absurd or not, this is but one vignette from a little-known chapter of history: The wide ranging collaboration between Zionism and Hitler's Third Reich.
In early January 1941 a small but important Zionist organization submitted a formal proposal to German diplomats in Beirut for a military-political alliance with wartime Germany. The offer was made by the radical underground "Fighters for the Freedom of Israel", better known as the Lehi or Stern Gang. Its leader, Avraham Stern, had recently broken with the radical nationalist "National Military Organization" (Irgun Zvai Leumi - Etzel) over the group's attitude toward Britain, which had effectively banned further Jewish settlement of Palestine. Stern regarded Britain as the main enemy of Zionism.
This remarkable proposal "for the solution of the Jewish question in Europe and the active participation on the NMO [Lehi] in the war on the side of Germany" is worth quoting at some length:
"The NMO which is very familiar with the goodwill of the German Reich government and its officials towards Zionist activities within Germany and the Zionist emigration program takes the view that:
"On the basis of these considerations, and upon the condition that the German Reich government recognize the national aspirations of the Israel Freedom Movement mentioned above, the NMO in Palestine offers to actively take part in the war on the side of Germany.
"This offer by the NMO could include military, political and informational activity within Palestine and, after certain organizational measures, outside as well. Along with this the "Jewish" men of Europe would be militarily trained and organized in military units under the leadership and command of the NMO. They would take part in combat operations for the purpose of conquering Palestine, should such a front be formed.
"The indirect participation of the Israel Freedom Movement in the New Order of Europe, already in the preparatory stage, combined with a positive-radical solution of the European-Jewish problem on the basis of the national aspirations of the Jewish people mentioned above, would greatly strengthen the moral foundation of the New Order in the eyes of all humanity.
"The cooperation of the Israel Freedom Movement would also be consistent with a recent speech by the German Reich Chancellor, in which Hitler stressed that he would utilize any combination and coalition in order to isolate and defeat England".
(Original document in German Auswertiges Amt Archiv, Bestand 47-59, E224152 and E234155-58.
On the basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood, National Socialists and Zionists worked together for what each group believed was in its own national interests.
This is just one example of the Zionist movements' collaboration with Hitler for the purpose of possibly receiving jurisdiction over a minute piece of earth, Palestine.
And to top it all up, brainwashing!
How far this unbelievable Zionist conspiracy has captured the Jewish masses, and how impossible it is for any different thought to penetrate their minds, even to the point of mere evaluation, can be seen in the vehemence of the reaction to any reproach. With blinded eyes and closed ears, any voice raised in protest and accusation is immediately suppressed and deafened by the thousandfold cry: "Traitor," "Enemy of the Jewish People."
| |
JEWS NOT ZIONISTS
| |
Our vision is to produce accurate information about health threats. The biggest problem in Western countries is a constant, unilaterally too acidic diet, which the body is unable to buffer sufficiently, and the entire metabolic system has to work against the acidity. Eventually, the body begins to become inflamed and reaches a persistent inflammatory state without the patient noticing.
lauantai 2. marraskuuta 2019
The Role of Zionism in the Holocaust
perjantai 1. marraskuuta 2019
Päivi Räsänen read almost 4 hours in duration, interrogation the police law and the word of God
“A crime report is being filed with police to determine whether the MP was guilty of a crime by posting a Twitter message in June. The message depicts the Helsinki Pride event as a pride for sin and shame and questions the Church’s involvement in the event”
Päivi Räsänen, former Minister of the Interior of Finland, read almost 4 hours in duration, interrogation the police law and the word of God
Päivi Räsänen, former Minister of the Interior of Finland, read almost 4 hours in duration, interrogation the police law and the word of God
Päivi Räsänen read almost 4 hours in duration, interrogation the police law and the word of God:"I got the feeling that this is just to this end"
MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT and the chairman of the parliamentary group of Päivi Räsänen (Christian Democrats) characterizes today's poliisikuulusteluaan "tight setiksi". He says the interrogation lasted almost four hours.
- There's no other way to drink water in between. The police had a long list of questions. I was under strict examination, Räsänen says.
Räsänen suspected of ethnic agitation. He himself claims to have taken tweet the law and order of the church in those activities. Questioning took place, inter alia, through the word of the Bible and church law.
The law defines the Church, that the Church's task is to "preach the word of God." The Church of Association again states that "all to learn in the Church must be examined and evaluated according to the sacred word of God." Räsänen believes stance, did just the church in order that assessment.
In June, in its twiitissä Räsänen shared a photo of verses in Romans 1. 24-27, where gay sexuality equated with shame and sin. Räsänen twiitillään criticized the fact that the Church proclaimed Pride event as an official partner.
- The Bible was quite literally on the table open and it was read at several points. For example, I had to assess what is the connection of these verses the rest of Romans. We went through the Romans the third reading and the second Cor. You could say that pretty much theological discussion, Räsänen says.
RÄSÄNEN admits that he was aware of the purpose of writing Tweets to get it spread to the widest possible audience. He shared the same content text but also on Facebook and Instagram.
- It was not just any internal debate within the church, but yes, I had a goal to stimulate discussion more broadly.
Räsänen says absolute respect for the human dignity of homosexuals and that they have imported this also raised questioning. He justifies the writings belief and religious freedom. He believes the church on the Pride event contrary to the Charter of the Church, namely the Bible.
- The Bible teaches that sexual relations outside of marriage are not in accordance with the will of God, and not in the way a source of pride as Pride event are shown, says Räsänen.
A CHEERFUL -sounding Räsänen says its departure from the examination with satisfaction. He trusts the police, and encourages everyone to use the freedom of speech and freedom of religion.
- I'm grateful that I got so thoroughly to find out their views. At the same time, however, came to feel that this is just to this end. It is possible that this is proceeding the prosecutor.
Päivi Räsänen took his first acts selfie in front of police headquarters for questioning upon arrival. (IMAGE: JOHN HELTTUNEN )
Räsänen says absolute respect for the human dignity of homosexuals and that they have imported this also raised questioning. He justifies the writings belief and religious freedom. He believes the church on the Pride event contrary to the Charter of the Church, namely the Bible.
- The Bible teaches that sexual relations outside of marriage are not in accordance with the will of God, and not in the way a source of pride as Pride event are shown, says Räsänen.
A CHEERFUL -sounding Räsänen says its departure from the examination with satisfaction. He trusts the police, and encourages everyone to use the freedom of speech and freedom of religion.
- I'm grateful that I got so thoroughly to find out their views. At the same time, however, came to feel that this is just to this end. It is possible that this is proceeding the prosecutor.
Päivi Räsänen took his first acts selfie in front of police headquarters for questioning upon arrival. (IMAGE: JOHN HELTTUNEN )
- Does the licensing believe, teach and publicly displayed the message of the Bible, which is almost every Finnish home, Räsänen asks.
Räsänen says that he will not give up the case and is ready to go as far as you need it.
- I do not believe in any judgment, but if you would so far, so yes, then it certainly should go ahead. But they are now there is no point at this stage to predict.
FOR THE FIRST time in the police interview suspects had Räsänen experienced a situation absurd, because it is convinced her conscience.
- Yes, this is a strange feeling to be precisely such a case on suspicion of engaging. On the other hand, what is this good for your self is that it must contain a clear conscience. I do not feel guilty of an offense and I have nothing to regret in this matter.
Räsänen According to him, also asked, whether he is prepared to remove tweets led to a criminal investigation.
- I replied that I did not agree. I stand behind my words, says Räsänen.
Finnish Politician, Pastor’s Wife Under Investigation for Saying Pride in Sin Not ‘Compatible’ With Bible
By Heather Clark on
“A crime report is being filed with police to determine whether the MP was guilty of a crime by posting a Twitter message in June. The message depicts the Helsinki Pride event as a pride for sin and shame and questions the Church’s involvement in the event,” a press release from the Helsinki Police Department reads.
“According to the advertiser, the message is an expression of intolerance towards minorities.”
https://christiannews.net/2019/09/05/finnish-politician-pastors-wife-under-investigation-for-saying-pride-in-sin-not-compatible-with-bible/“A crime report is being filed with police to determine whether the MP was guilty of a crime by posting a Twitter message in June. The message depicts the Helsinki Pride event as a pride for sin and shame and questions the Church’s involvement in the event,” a press release from the Helsinki Police Department reads.
“According to the advertiser, the message is an expression of intolerance towards minorities.”
Räsänen remarked on the investigation a few weeks ago, stating that she is not worried about herself but rather how the matter might affect Christians in general.
“I am not concerned on my part, as I trust this will not move on to the prosecutor,” she said. “However, I am concerned if quoting the Bible is considered even ‘slightly’ illegal. I hope this won’t lead to self-censorship among Christians. Rom. 1:24–27.”
__
Helsinki Police Department

Established in 1826, the Helsinki Police has roughly 1,600 staff, of whom police officers number is approximately 1,300.
The Helsinki Police is in charge of the general order and safety, crime prevention and extensive investigation, and license services in the City of Helsinki. In addition to its basic duties, the Police Department has a high number of national and regional special policing tasks.
https://www.poliisi.fi/en/helsinki
The Helsinki Police is in charge of the general order and safety, crime prevention and extensive investigation, and license services in the City of Helsinki. In addition to its basic duties, the Police Department has a high number of national and regional special policing tasks.
https://www.poliisi.fi/en/helsinki
____
Päivi Räsänen
Päivi Räsänen
| |
|---|---|
Räsänen in 2015
| |
| Minister of the Interior of Finland | |
| In office 22 June 2011 – 29 May 2015 | |
| Prime Minister | Jyrki Katainen Alexander Stubb |
| Preceded by | Anne Holmlund |
| Succeeded by | Petteri Orpo |
| Member of the Finnish Parliament | |
| Assumed office 1995 | |
| Chairperson of the Finnish Christian Democrats | |
| In office October 2, 2004 – August 28, 2015 | |
| Preceded by | Bjarne Kallis |
| Succeeded by | Sari Essayah |
| Personal details | |
| Born | December 19, 1959 (age 59) Sonkajärvi |
| Political party | Christian Democrats |
| Occupation | physician |
| Profession | Licentiate in Medicine |
| Website | Official website |
Päivi Maria Räsänen, née Kuvaja (born December 19, 1959, in Sonkajärvi, Finland[1]), is a Finnish politician. The chairwoman of the Christian Democrats from 2004 to 2015, she was the Minister of the Interior of Finland between 2011 and 2015.[2]
A physician by education, Räsänen entered politics in the early 1990s, running for parliament in 1991. She has been in the Riihimäki City Council since 1993, and in the Finnish Parliament since 1995. She was elected the chairperson of the Christian Democrats in October 2, 2004.[3] Following the government formation after the 2011 election, which led to the Christian Democrats joining the government, Räsänen was nominated by the party as the Minister of the Interior in the 72nd Finnish Cabinet led by Jyrki Katainen,[4] and she was inaugurated along with the government on June 22, 2011.[2]
Contents
Career and political positions[edit]
Räsänen has been characterized as a conservative. On October 12, 2010, Räsänen was one of the participants on a live TV debate on Ajankohtainen kakkonen's Homoilta special, with the topic of same-sex marriage and LGBT rights. The program was followed by an unprecedented exodus from the Evangelical Lutheran Church — in a few weeks, nearly 40,000 members left the Church through the website eroakirkosta.fi.[5][6] Räsänen was on the show representing her party and herself as a Christian individual along with five other opponents of gay marriage, but the resignations were specifically attributed to her by the media in general and then-Minister of Culture and Sports Stefan Wallin.[7] Räsänen thinks homosexual acts are a sin[8] and she herself does not consider her views "specifically extreme".[9]
When interviewed by Ylioppilaslehti on October 29, 2010, Räsänen said that she would favor Christians over Muslims when selecting asylum seekers to Finland due, in her opinion, to Muslims' "difficulties to adjust to the Finnish culture".[10] Her comments were condemned as "incomprehensible and merciless" by then-Minister of Migration and European Affairs Astrid Thors and then-Minister of Culture and Sports Stefan Wallin.[11] Räsänen responded to the criticism, saying her comments were misinterpreted, since she did not consider religion as the main criterion for asylum seekers' admissions, but instead she wanted to highlight the benefits of refugees' integration through religious connections.[12] In practice, as minister in charge of immigration affairs Räsänen has advocated for increasing the number of refugees taken in by Finland, especially from Syria.[13]
In September 2012 Räsänen appointed a religiously conservative applicant, considered less qualified by the media, among six candidates to Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Interior Affairs, which created considerable debate, especially as she had previously condemned political appointments of government officials.[14]
Stance on abortion[edit]
She is pro-life on abortion. She has made statements on the matter, since she is Minister of the Interior, that led a number of Finns to leave the Lutheran church of Finland via an online service in July 2013.[15] Räsänen contrasted abortion law to animal protection law saying that the latter gives better protection for animals than the former does to humans (fetuses):
"The law on animal protection gives better protection to an animal about to be put down than the law on abortion does to an unborn child. It is forbidden to cause the animal pain when slaughtering it, but no one dares to even discuss the painfulness of abortion. Abortion is defended on the grounds that the fetus is not a human person, even though it is a biological human individual from the moment of conception."[16]
In total 6,500 persons left the church in the first six days following the controversy, while the average number had been 70 persons a day prior to it.[17]
Personal life[edit]
Räsänen is married and has five children. She lives in Riihimäki.[1] Räsänen is a physician and holds a Licentiate of Medicine.
References[edit]
- ^ Jump up to:a b "Päivi Räsänen". Helsingin Sanomat (in Finnish). Sanoma News. April 11, 2009. Retrieved June 23, 2011.
- ^ Jump up to:a b "Ms Päivi Räsänen is the New Minister of the Interior". Ministry of the Interior. June 22, 2011. Archived from the original on September 27, 2011. Retrieved June 23, 2011.
- ^ "Räsänen nousi kristillisdemokraattien johtoon" (in Finnish). MTV3. Suomen Tietotoimisto. October 2, 2004. Retrieved June 23, 2011.
- ^ Laitinen, Joonas (June 18, 2011). "Kristillisten Päivi Räsänen ottaa vastuun maahanmuuttoasioista". Helsingin Sanomat (in Finnish). Sanoma News. Retrieved June 23, 2011.
- ^ Seppälä, Olli (November 2, 2010). "Homoillan jälkeen yli 40 000 eronnut kirkosta" (in Finnish). Kotimaa-yhtiöt. Archived from the original on November 6, 2010. Retrieved June 23, 2011.
- ^ "Yli 56 000 eronnut tänä vuonna – Homoillan jälkeen 30 000 eroamista" (in Finnish). Vakaumusten tasa-arvo. October 20, 2010. Retrieved June 23, 2011.
- ^ "Wallin: Räsänen ei voi paeta vastuutaan". Helsingin Sanomat (in Finnish). Sanoma News. Suomen Tietotoimisto. October 17, 2010. Retrieved June 23, 2011.
- ^ Pirhonen, Kalle (October 18, 2010). "Päivi Räsänen aamu-tv:ssä: "Homoseksuaalisuuden harjoittaminen on syntiä"". Ilta-Sanomat (in Finnish). Sanoma News. Retrieved June 23, 2011.
- ^ "Räsänen ei pidä homokommenttejaan erityisen jyrkkinä". Helsingin Sanomat (in Finnish). Sanoma News. Suomen Tietotoimisto. October 15, 2010. Retrieved June 23, 2011.
- ^ Manner, Maria (October 29, 2010). "Konservatiivien kuningatar". Ylioppilaslehti (in Finnish). Student Union of the University of Helsinki. Retrieved June 23, 2011.
- ^ "Wallin ja Thors: Räsäsen pakolaispuheet käsittämättömiä". Helsingin Sanomat (in Finnish). Sanoma News. Suomen Tietotoimisto. October 29, 2010. Retrieved June 23, 2011.
- ^ "Räsänen: Tulkinta pakolaispuheista yksiviivainen". Turun Sanomat (in Finnish). TS-Yhtymä. Suomen Tietotoimisto. October 29, 2010. Archived from the original on October 7, 2011. Retrieved June 23, 2011.
- ^ Sisäministeri Räsänen ottaisi Suomeen 300 kiintiöpakolaista lisää ensi vuonna, YLE 9 July 2014, accessed 9 July 2014
- ^ "Nergin nimitys oli tyylipuhtaasti, läpeensä poliittinen". Karjalainen (in Finnish). Pohjois-Karjalan Kirjapaino. September 8, 2012. Retrieved October 10, 2012.
- ^ Räsänen’s comments cause spike in church resignations yle 11.7.2013
- ^ ((in Finnish): “Eläinsuojelulaki antaa paremman suojan lopetettavalle eläimelle kuin aborttilaki syntymättömälle lapselle. Eläimelle ei saa teurastettaessa tuottaa kipua, mutta abortin kivuliaisuudesta ei uskalleta edes keskustella. Aborttia puolustetaan sillä, että sikiö ei ole ihmispersoona, vaikka onkin hedelmöityksestä lähtien biologinen ihmisyksilö”) Räsänen's speech
- ^ Räsäs-kohun aikana yli 6500 eronnut kirkosta Kaleva 17.7.2013
External links[edit]
Tilaa:
Blogitekstit (Atom)
Meet 'PayPal CEO' Alex Chriss - Why Should This Person Be Interesting To You
..funds vanish from user visibility into corporate vaults under the guise of "security reviews" or "processing holds." F...








