Our vision is to produce accurate information about health threats. The biggest problem in Western countries is a constant, unilaterally too acidic diet, which the body is unable to buffer sufficiently, and the entire metabolic system has to work against the acidity. Eventually, the body begins to become inflamed and reaches a persistent inflammatory state without the patient noticing.
Klankriminella riksdagsledamöter: Yilmaz Kerimo (s), Metin Ataseven (m), Edip Noyan (m) och Robert Halef (kd) pekas av polisen ut som klankriminella politiker i en hemlig rapport.
Fria Tider avslöjar: Här är de klankriminella riksdagspolitiker som pekas ut av polisen
Publicerad 24 september 2020 kl 13.27
POLITIK. Fria Tider kan idag som första media i Sverige publicera namn och bild på samtliga riksdagsledamöter som i en hemlig rapport från polisen pekas ut såsom knutna till kriminella klaner. Två av dem är moderater, en är kristdemokrat och en är socialdemokrat.
Den hemliga rapporten "Släktbaserade kriminella nätverk i Sverige" togs fram i januari i år av Nationella operativa avdelningen, Noa, en särskild underrättelseenhet inom polismyndigheten. I början av september avslöjade biträdande rikspolischef Mats Löfving att det finns ett 40-tal kriminella klaner i Sverige med den då okända rapporten som källa. – De strävar efter att bygga upp ett parallellt samhälle med ett parallellt rättssystem där lojaliteten och makten ligger hos familjen istället för hos staten, förklarade Noa-chefen Linda H Staaf för SVT apropå de kriminella klanerna. – Ur ett systemhotande perspektiv är det mycket, mycket allvarligt. Sedan dess har delar av den 33 sidor långa rapporten om klanerna läckt till flera medier, men Fria Tider har nu tagit del av hela den hemligstämplade rapporten. Av vad Fria Tider erfar är vi det enda nyhetsmedium som har tillgång till den i dess helhet.
Från Mellanöstern
Samtliga klaner som nämns i polisrapporten utgörs av släktnätverk med ursprung i Mellanöstern. Polisen konstaterar att det finns fler kriminella klaner i Sverige än de med Mellanösternbakgrund, exempelvis somaliska klaner som bland annat stöder den islamistiska terrorgruppen al-Shabaab. De skriver att "det har dock inte varit möjligt att titta närmare på dem inom ramen för rapporten".
Vidare konstateras i rapporten att "klansamhällen är vanligt förekommande" i Mellanöstern och att "genom sin kriminella verksamhet erhåller nätverken ekonomisk vinning. Hot, våld, utpressning, narkotika- och vapenhandel samt penningtvätt är genomgående drag bland de släktbaserade kriminella nätverken, men de enskilda nätverken ägnar sig även åt annan brottslighet." I rapporten pekas ett 20-tal städer och orter i Sverige ut där de klankriminella är verksamma. Dessutom namnges 121 klankriminella invandrare med fullständigt namn och personnummer. De 121 namngivna är endast ett urval av de klankriminella i Sverige, men de har tagits med i rapporten då de antingen bedöms ha en "äldste"-roll i klanerna alternativt är "tongivande" eller "särskilt brottsaktiva" aktörer.
Klankriminella riksdagsledamöter
Enligt polisen har de kriminella klanerna två mål: "ekonomisk vinning och inflytande över lokalsamhället". Men vissa av klanerna nöjer sig inte med makt på lokal nivå i de invandrartäta så kallat utsatta områden där de främst är verksamma. De har även medlemmar som engagerar sig politiskt, både på kommunal nivå och riksnivå. Vissa klankriminella har till och med lyckats ta sig in i riksdagen. Enligt polisen var den förste klankriminelle politikern som tog sig in i riksdagen Yilmaz Kerimo. Officiellt representerade han Socialdemokraterna i Sveriges lagstiftande församling mellan 1998 och 2017. Inofficiellt var han emellertid en representant för det så kallade Södertäljenätverket, en kriminell klan med bas i Södertälje, som utgörs av syrianer/assyrier (ej att förväxla med syrier). Den syrianska klanen består främst av invandrare från Turkiet. 2010 fick Kerimo sällskap av ytterligare tre representanter från den kriminella klanen. Två av dem var Massut "Metin" Ataseven och Edip Noyan, som båda var riksdagsledamöter för Moderaterna 2010 till 2014. Den tredje var Robert Halef som sedan 2010 är riksdagsledamot för Kristdemokraterna och fortfarande sitter i riksdagen för partiet. Halef har tidigare pekats ut som klankriminell i en artikel i Expressen.
Enligt polisens rapport har Södertäljenätverket "ojämförligt störst inflytande på det politiska livet på såväl kommunal som på nationell nivå". De har "möjliggörare och infiltratörer inom kommunal och statlig förvaltning. Polisens bedömning är att tongivande kriminella aktörer inom Södertäljenätverket har en god förmåga att knyta, för den kriminella verksamheten, strategiskt viktiga kontakter på tjänstemannanivå inom Södertälje kommun och inom myndigheter", fortsätter rapporten. Förutom i riksdagen har Södertäljenätverket dessutom representanter i Södertäljes kommunfullmäktige. De har infiltrerat kommunen med tjänstemän som hjälper klanen med exempelvis bygglov och klanmedlemmar jobbar på såväl Försäkringskassan som Arbetsförmedlingen för att se till att klanen kommer över bidragspengar.
Inte bara syrianer
Även om syrianerna pekas ut som en av de mer problematiska invandrargrupperna när det gäller klankriminalitet, så är de långt ifrån de enda som organiserar sig i sådana klaner. En annan problematisk invandrargrupp är så kallade mardelliaraber, som ibland även kallas för mhallami, mardinli eller mhalmiter. Mardelliaraber är en arabisk-muslimsk folkgrupp som ursprungligen kommer från Turkiet. Under turkiska frihetskriget för hundra år sedan flydde många mardelliaraber till Libanon, och under inbördeskriget i Libanon på 1980-talet kom många av dem till Europa. Av det 40-tal kriminella klaner som polisrapporten identifierar utgörs hälften av muslimska mardelliaraber. Familjen Ali Khan, en klan som främst är verksam i Göteborgsområdet, utgörs av mardelliaraber. Till skillnad från syrianerna i Södertäljenätverket har araberna i Ali Khan-klanen betydligt svårare för att infiltrera kommunen eller myndigheterna "eftersom medlemmarna saknar högre utbildning", konstaterar polisen. Istället förlitar sig klanen på våld, hot och trakasserier, ofta mot myndigheter och tjänstemän, för att få igenom sin vilja. Vid behov kallar de in klanmedlemmar från Tyskland och Nederländerna. En fjärdedel av klanerna, tio stycken, kan istället kopplas till invandare från Palestina. Det finns även kriminella klaner i Sverige som bildats av invandrare från Libanon, Irak och Afghanistan, konstaterar polisen i sin hemliga rapport.
“The Human Papilloma Vaccine (HPV) is a treatment in widespread use but its efficacy in preventing cancer is medically unproven, while unintended, adverse reactions are blighting and even ending the lives of girls and young women across the world. However, pharmaceutical manufacturers and many health authorities are refusing to acknowledge there is a problem and the medical community is continuing to offer the vaccine. Sacrificial Virgins – so named because the vaccine is often given to girls before they become sexually active – exposes increasing evidence of serious neurological damage following the HPV injections. It calls for the vaccine to be withdrawn in the hope that this will help to halt another global tragedy.” (Homepage for the film)
When it comes to the Gardasil vaccine, there are a number of reasons why it makes absolutely no sense to recommend it, or take it. There are a long list of reasons to back this up, and it’s a head scratcher as to why this information is usually ignored and censored by the mainstream.
--> Help Support CE:Become a member of CETV and get access to exclusive news and courses to help empower you to become an effective changemaker. Also, help us beat censorship! Click here to join.
It’s no secret that vaccines are not completely safe for everyone, it’s clearly not a ‘one size fits all’ product, and that’s evident by the fact that nearly $4 billion has been paid out to families of vaccine injured children via the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA).As astronomical as the monetary awards are, they’re even more alarming considering that only an estimated 1% of vaccine injuries are even reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).
“I would never give my daughter, or my son the shot… This is a massive PR event by the company that makes Gardasil, and the same is the truth for the company that makes Cervarix… I think one needs to do a lot of research, and I think parents are in the best position to do that.” – Dr. Christopher Shaw – University of British Columbia
I you want to verify the quote from shaw above, and what he is saying, you can contact him and ask him about the vaccine.
Recent Science
A new study published in The Royal Society of Medicine is one of multiple studies over the years that has emerged questioning the efficacy of the HPV vaccine. The researchers conducted an appraisal of published phase 2 and 3 efficacy trials in relation to the prevention of cervical cancer and their analysis showed “the trials themselves generated significant uncertainties undermining claims of efficacy” in the data they used. The researchers emphasized that “it is still uncertain whether human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination prevents cervical cancer as trials were not designed to detect this outcome, which takes decades to develop.” The researchers point out that the trials used to test the vaccine may have “overestimated” the efficacy of the vaccine.
A part of the problem, as the study points out, is that it’s unknown as to whether certain infections would clear, or would persist and lead to cervical changes. This is a big point. Every year around the world, approximately 13.1/100,000 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer, so the rate of incidence is quite low. Furthermore, the vaccination is offered to girls aged 9-13, as the study points out, “before sexual debut and naive to HPV infection.”
The study reviewed 35 published papers relating to 12 randomized blinded non-HPV vaccine-controlled Phase 2 and 3 trials of Gardasil and Cervarix conducted from 2001 to 2016 assessing efficacy against cervical cancer and its precursors. Researchers also examined 39 meta-analyses and systematic reviews of HPV vaccine efficacy.
No Evidence HPV Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer
They emphasized after their examination that that none of the trials they examined were actually designed to determine efficacy or effectiveness of the HPV vaccine against cervical cancer. In fact, there were no reported cases of cervical cancer in any of the trials.
The time between first exposure to HPV and peak development of CIN3 is 7–10 years. It takes a further 10 years or so for cervical cancer to develop according to natural history studies. All trials had a mean length of follow-up of six or fewer years, apart from the HPV-023 extension with a mean follow-up of 8.9 years.
The authors point out that it was even questionable whether or not the vaccine prevents pre-cancerous lesions.
HPV Infections Often Clear On Their Own
One issue is that cervical cancer takes many years to develop. Out of all the women who get an HPV infection, approximately 70 percent of those are going to clear that infection all by themselves. The body will take care of it, and you don’t even have to detect it, within two years of the infection, approximately 90 percent of women will have cleared that HPV infection with no help. By three years, half of the remaining 10 percent will have progressed into a CIN 2 3 lesion, a pre-cancerous legion. So, approximately 5 percent of of the original 100 percent of women with an HPV infection will develop into a pre-cancerous lesion.
So now, you have that small group of women who now have pre-cancerous lesions, so now lets look at those moving into actual cancer. What we know is that amongst women with CIN 3 lesions, which is a little bit more severe than CIN 2 lesions, it takes five years for approximately 20 percent of those to develop into cancer, if they do. Furthermore, it takes about 30 years for 40 percent of them to become cancer.
The information above is why multiple studies have questioned the administration of the HPV vaccine. In a study published in Autoimmunity Reviews, the authors note that “The decision to vaccinate with HPV vaccine is a personal decision, not one that must be made for public health. HPV is not a lethal disease, in 95 percent of the infections; and the other 5 percent are detectable and treatable in the precancerous state.
So, one must ask themselves, What are the chances of a 9-13 year old girl getting an HPV infection? And what are the chances of that infection clearing itself? Furthermore, the vaccine only provides 5-10 years immunity, so when that 9 year old reaches the age of 19, or perhaps sooner, the immunity they’ve received from a few, out of many types of HPV infections, is no longer there. There are more than 100 HPV infections, and only 12 of them are carcinogenic to humans.
Furthermore, the idea that the HPV vaccine helps prevent cervical cancer, according to this recent study, is not a correct assumption, so one must ask themselves why is it marketed in that manner?
Corroboration From Other Studies
Again the main study of discussion in this article is complemented by many others that emphasize the same thing. For example, a study published in 2013 in Current Pharmaceutical Design carried out a review of HPV vaccine pre- and post-licensure trials to assess the evidence of their effectiveness and safety. They found that,
HPV vaccine clinical trials design, and data interpretation of both efficacy and safety outcomes, were largely inadequate. Additionally, we note evidence of selective reporting of results from clinical trials (i.e., exclusion of vaccine efficacy figures related to study subgroups in which efficacy might be lower or even negative from peer-reviewed publications). Given this, the widespread optimism regarding HPV vaccines long-term benefits appears to rest on a number of unproven assumptions (or such which are at odds with factual evidence) and significant misinterpretation of available data.
For example, the claim that HPV vaccination will result in approximately 70% reduction of cervical cancers is made despite the fact that the clinical trials data have not demonstrated to date that the vaccines have actually prevented a single case of cervical cancer (let alone cervical cancer death), nor that the current overly optimistic surrogate marker-based extrapolations are justified. Likewise, the notion that HPV vaccines have an impressive safety profile is only supported by highly flawed design of safety trials and is contrary to accumulating evidence from vaccine safety surveillance databases and case reports which continue to link HPV vaccination to serious adverse outcomes (including death and permanent disabilities).
We thus conclude that further reduction of cervical cancers might be best achieved by optimizing cervical screening (which carries no such risks) and targeting other factors of the disease rather than by the reliance on vaccines with questionable efficacy and safety profiles.
Is The HPV Vaccine 100% Safe?
Given the information above, I would personally have a hard time justifying giving my daughter the HPV vaccine. The risk is very low for a young girl to develop cervical cancer, as you can see from the information provided above. Furthermore, the HPV vaccine is not completely safe for everybody. For example, after the HPV vaccine, a disabling syndrome of chronic neuropathic pain, fatigue, and autonomic dysfunction may manifest. In questionnaires from 45 individuals who experienced issues after HPV vaccination,
Twenty-nine percent of the cases had immediate (within 24 h) post-vaccination illness onset. The most common presenting complaints were musculoskeletal pain (66%), fatigue (57%), headache (57%), dizziness/vertigo (43%), and paresthesias/allodynia (36%). Fifty-three percent of affected individuals fulfill the fibromyalgia criteria…After a mean period of 4.2 ± 2.5 years post-vaccination, 93% of patients continue to have incapacitating symptoms and remain unable to attend school or work.
A Study published in Clinical Rheumatology entitled “Serious adverse events after HPV vaccination: a critical review of randomized and post-marketing case series” also brings up concerns:
HPV vaccine randomized trials were identified in PubMed. Safety data were extracted. Post-marketing case series describing HPV immunization adverse events were reviewed. Most HPV vaccine randomized trials did not use inert placebo in the control group. Two of the largest randomized trials found significantly more severe adverse events in the tested HPV vaccine arm of the study.Is The Aluminum In HPV Vaccines The Issue?
Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. (source)
Many scientists presented facts about vaccines and vaccine safety at the recent Global Health Vaccine Safety summit hosted by the World Health Organization in Geneva, Switzerland.
An interesting point that caught my attention was made by Dr. Martin Howell Friede, Coordinator of Initiative For Vaccine Research at the World Health Organization. He brought up the topic of vaccine adjuvants like aluminum. In certain vaccines, without these adjuvants the vaccine simply doesn’t work. Dr. Friede mentioned that there are clinical studies that blame adjuvants for adverse events seen as a result of administering vaccines, and how people in general often blame adverse reactions to vaccines being the result of the vaccine adjuvant. He mentioned aluminum specifically.
He showed concern given the fact that “without adjuvants, we are not going to have the next generation of vaccines.” He also stated that,
When we add an adjuvant, it’s because it is essential. We do not add adjuvants to vaccines because we want to do so, but when we add them it adds to the complexity. And I give courses every year on ‘how do you develop vaccines’ and ‘how do you make vaccines’ and the first lesson is, while you are making your vaccine, if you can avoid using an adjuvant, please do so. Lesson two is, if you’re going to use an adjuvant, use one that has a history of safety, and lesson three is, if you’re not going to do that, think very carefully.
You can read more about that, and find links to the conference and it’s full coverage in this article I published about it a few weeks ago.
In 2018, a paper published in The Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry found that almost 100 percent of the intramuscularly injected aluminum in mice as vaccine adjuvants was absorbed into the systemic circulation and traveled to different sites in the body such as the brain, the joints, and the spleen, where it accumulated and was retained post-vaccination. The researchers also found massive damage to motor neurons and behaviour abnormalities after injection. This study complimented and earlier study published in in 2015 that found the following:
Evidence that aluminum-coated particles phagocytozed in the injected muscle and its draining lymph nodes can disseminate within phagocytes throughout the body and slowly accumulate in the brain further suggests that alum safety should be evaluated in the long term.
When it comes to the HPV vaccine, there are multiple examples of injury. Here is one specific examples out of many you can read about more in depth.
The Deep Reasons/Science As To Why This Vaccine Seems To Be A Problem
Like I’ve said, we’ve published a number of articles that dive deep into the HPV vaccine and why it doesn’t really make sense to take it. If you’re curious and want to learn more beyond what’s presented in the documentary, you can refer to the Children’s Health Defense as well as some of the articles below:
A Note About Aluminum – Because The HPV Vaccine Has Lots of It
Vaccine ingredients are a big issue, especially aluminum. A number of scientists have started to recognize this and are thankfully taking matters into their own hands. One of the best examples is Dr. Christopher Exley, a Professor in Bioinorganic Chemistry at Keele University who’s considered by many to be the world’s leading expert in aluminum toxicology.
One ingredient that hasn’t gone through appropriate safety testing is the aluminum adjuvant that’s used in vaccines.
A study published in 2011 makes the issue quite clear:
Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. (source)
The key takeaway here is that “medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor.”
After this study, more research came out to help us better understand what happens when aluminum is injected into the body. It has been found that injected aluminum does not exit the body; in fact, it stays in the body and travels to various organs in the brain, where it remains. This isn’t surprising since it’s the adjuvant, it’s designed to stay there or else the vaccine doesn’t work.
Evidence that aluminum-coated particles phagocytozed in the injected muscle and its draining lymph nodes can disseminate within phagocytes throughout the body and slowly accumulate in the brain further suggests that alum safety should be evaluated in the long term.
Furthermore, in 2018, a paper published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry found that almost 100 percent of the intramuscularly injected aluminum in mice as vaccine adjuvants was absorbed into the systemic circulation and traveled to different sites in the body such as the brain, the joints, and the spleen, where it accumulated and was retained for years post-vaccination. (source)
Exley has been interviewed multiple times about this subject, and all of these studies and his research point to the same findings: Aluminum in vaccines does not exit the body, and it has been linked to multiple diseases, which can develop immediately post-injection or up to decades later in life for certain neurological diseases such as Alzheimer’s.
A study by Exley and his team published in 2018 should have made headlines everywhere, as it discovered historically high amounts of aluminum in autistic brains. The study was conducted by some of the world’s leading scientists in the field.
Other studies by multiple scientists in this field have shown massive damage to motor neurons in the brain of mice and sheep as a result of the aluminum when injected, as well as behavioural abnormalities in mice and sheep along with cognitive decline.(source)
In the interview below, Exley answers a lot of questions, but the part that caught my attention was:
We have looked at what happens to the aluminum adjuvant when it’s injected and we have shown that certain types of cells come to the injection site and take up the aluminum inside them. You know, these same cells we also see in the brain tissue in autism. So, for the first time we have a link that honestly I had never expected to find between aluminum as an adjuvant in vaccines and that same aluminum potentially could be carried by those same cells across the blood brain barrier into the brain tissue where it could deposit the aluminum and produce a disease, Encephalopathy (brain damage), it could produce the more severe and disabling form of autism. This is a really shocking finding for us.
The interview is quite informative with regards to aluminum toxicology in general, but if you’re interested in the quote above, you can fast forward to the twelve minutes and thirty seconds mark.
The Takeaway
It’s okay to question vaccine safety. Despite all of the manipulation by mainstream media and the big entities using mass marketing to ridicule anybody who questions the safety of vaccines, it’s something important we must all do. It’s okay not to trust your doctor when it comes to information on vaccines. Why? Because they aren’t really knowledgable. Sure, they can explain how a vaccine works, but as far as research and furthering their education, it’s rare to find a doctor who has gone beyond their education and really looked into these subjects. They are trained to believe that vaccines are unquestionably safe, and if they openly question vaccine safety they are in danger of losing their licence. How crazy is that?
The example above with regards to aluminum is one of many concerns that are being ignored. If aluminum in vaccines, for example, is safe, then why don’t our federal health regulatory agencies simply conduct the studies to prove it?
Collective Evolution is one of the world's fastest-growing conscious media and education companies providing news and tools to raise collective consciousness. Get inside access to Collective Evolution by becoming a member of CETV.
Stream content 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, documentaries and guided programs.
Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and help conscious media thrive!
David Martin: Fauci Funded COVID-19 Development in Wuhan
September 20, 2020
"Somebody is using this criminal [Fauci] to act an unspeakable amount of terror on the US and the global population. And they're using him because they know he's compromised."
"The Department of Health and Human Services, the National Institute of Health, NIAID, and CDC are criminal colluding parties. I'm saying that word, and that's a heavy word, I'm not saying it lightly. The interesting way I define criminal is if there is an explicit law that you are explicitly violating. For me, that's a crime."
"If Attorney General Barr was awake right now he would realize that they've handed him the case of a lifetime...[Fauci] has violated the Clayton Act of the United States. Now, he may have a thousand reasons why he thinks it's justified, but it isn't. It's a violation of the law. He should be cuffed, he should be tried", said David Martin on the David Knight Show.
Martin gave a detailed explanation of COVID-19's history as a project funded by the NIH. He described how research on it was continued even after doing so was made illegal. Martin also states the ways Fauci violated antitrust laws and laundered money in the process of illegally developing it.
Many ethical and legal issues surround the NIH's funding of "gain of function" research -- bringing in deadly bacteria or viruses and making them more contagious and lethal -- Knight pointed out the dangerous lapses that caused Congress to order NIH to cease the "research".
NIH continued the prohibited research domestically and funded research at Wuhan. The $3.7 million given to Wuhan was nothing compared to UNC-Chapel Hill.
Martin explained, "the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill ethics review board got together and said 'yes, we think it's ethical', even though [Congress] had said it's illegal, 'we think it's ethical to take a Chinese pathogen and come up with synthetic mutations of the Chinese pathogen called the Wuhan Institute of virology coronavirus-1' in 2016. You cannot look at that and say there's anything but criminal intent because the government representing the people of the United States has said this is unethical. We have said that we aren't going to fund it. We have said that this is a line we cannot cross. And what does Fauci do? He writes another check."
"We're not talking about $3.7 million laundered through the eco-health alliance because that was money laundering, by the way, that's what it is when you provide capital to a party who's not the beneficiary of the capital. Money laundering, wire fraud, how many things can we throw on this thing? They knew they were doing it, and not only did they do it but they also got $1.7 billion per year, our taxpayer dollars. $1.7 billion per year that was directed through NIAID to deal with bioterrorism and bio-hazard research... The great thing about [this money] is that it goes through so many different affiliations that you can't follow it. But the best thing about that news is that if Attorney General Barr was awake right now he would realize that they've handed him the case of a lifetime," continued Martin.
"I'm pointing out that it's criminal -- and once again let's be precise -- what's the crime? The crime is, by sitting on three boards and being the director of funds, [Fauci] has violated the Clayton Act of the United States. Now, he may have a thousand reasons why he thinks it's justified, but it isn't. It's a violation of the law. He should be cuffed, he should be tried."
"Somebody is using this criminal [Fauci] to act an unspeakable amount of terror on the US and the global population. And they're using him because they know he's compromised."
"The Department of Health and Human Services, the National Institute of Health, NIAID, and CDC are criminal colluding parties. I'm saying that word, and that's a heavy word, I'm not saying it lightly. The interesting way I define criminal is if there is an explicit law that you are explicitly violating. For me, that's a crime."
End of quote.
David pulls no punches and puts several more nails in the coffin of the notion that COVID-19 came from bats being sold in a wet market in Wuhan. He also reveals that a "foundation" connected to Facebook-funded Event 201, the planning event run last October in preparation for the COVID-19 scamdemic, and many other threads connected to it.
Lindsey Williams was a "missionary" in Alaska during the building of the massive Alaskan oil pipeline, and came to know many of the global elite and has shared a lot of information they shared with him over the years. His material was confirmation of many things I have otherwise understood from other sources.
This video provides confirmation of recent events and some to shortly come. Lindsey is a good man, albeit mired in a Christian perspective. I can look past that slant to the information he is sharing.
I have taken one viewer's quick bullet point summary and added a little to it.
1. SARS-COV-2 was released by the elite (shared 3 years ago as a forecast that was accurate to the month) to test whether the churches would close per government orders. Because the Constitution grants all worship houses the right to refuse government-ordered closure, the churches closed and failed the litmus test of the elite: they buckled under and fell from grace. Personally, there was a lot more to this than just that. The fact that it was a carefully planned event is beyond question.
2. The elite will release a new more deadly virus and thus you must boost your immunity now.
Lindsey said he didn't know what the next "pandemic" would be (not necessarily a virus), but implored people to get their immune systems in tip-top condition in preparation.
3. The elite will cause a record cold snap prior to Nov 3 to destroy the crops and precipitate a food shortage - stock up now'. If you have been watching, they did the same thing last year in the US, along with measures in most parts of the world to destroy the global food supply. I have been writing about this for well over a year, maybe two.
4. Your cell phone spies for the elite (anyone shocked by this revelation?)
For me, as in the past, most of what Lindsey says is confirmation of other sources, including the second planned "pandemic".
The plan to induce unseasonal cold in the northern US this Fall is news to me but no surprise.
The evidence is everywhere as to what's happening if you are but willing to look.
David Martin, PhD , DavidMartin.world, joins to discuss the criminal violations of Fauci — and the money trail & patents that lead to the usual suspects. Money through shell corporations to fund banned research, corruption, predatory pricing, anti-trust violations — Fauci could easily be led away in handcuffs if AG Barr wished.
For viral content, in-depth insights and breaking news be sure to follow David Knight on Parlor and Twitter @Libertytarian
”Se, mikä ei oikeus ja kohtuus ole, ei taida olla lakikaan.”
Professori varoittaa: Oikeuslaitoksen politisoituminen vie mielivaltaan
MARKKU JOKIPII | 19.09.2020 | 08:49- päivitetty
Timo Vihavaista kummeksuttaa, minkälaisten asioiden parissa syyttäjäviranomainen askartelee.
Kanavan uusimmassa numerossa emeritusprofessori Timo Vihavainen vetoaa oikeuskansleria puuttumaan ”syyttäjälaitoksen vaaralliseen kiihkeyteen luisua jopa poliittisen, uskonnollisen tai muun kuppikunnan suosijaksi”. Vihavainen ei Jälkisanat –kolumnissaan mainitse tapauksia tarkalleen, mutta ottaa esimerkiksi Raamatun siteeraamisen.
Vihavaista kummeksuttaa, minkälaisten asioiden parissa syyttäjäviranomainen askartelee. Lakipykälän perusteella on ollut helppo väittää, että tieto, mielipide tai muu viesti muka ainakin panettelee tai solvaa jotakin ryhmää, vaikka ei nyt sitten ihan uhkaisikaan.
– Nyt olemme jo jonkin aikaa saaneet todistaa kummallista näytelmää. Korkeimmat syyttäjäviranomaiset ovat askarrelleet poliitikkojen puheiden parissa jopa eduskunnassa pidettyjen puheiden laillisuudesta kiinnostuneina ja niissä tapahtuneita törkeitä rikoksia muka jäljittäen, Vihavainen kirjoittaa.
– Jopa Raamatun siteeraaminen sosiaalisessa mediassa on haluttu tulkita rikolliseksi ja se on johtanut monien tuntien pituisiin kuulusteluihin maassamme, jossa uskonnonvapaus on perustuslaissa säädetty. Kun asianomainen on kutsuttu keskusteluohjelmaan esittelemään perusteita vakaumukselleen, on seurauksena taas uusi yritys leimata hänet rikolliseksi, hän jatkaa.
Professorin mielestä tässä on ovi avattuna mielivallalle, jota on voitu hyödyntää poliittisesti.
– Vaikka mitään kiihottamista sanan normaalissa merkityksessä ei ole tapahtunut on valtakunnansyyttäjä yrittänyt ajaa asiaansa vastoin asiaa tutkineiden poliisiviranomaisten kantaa.
Vihavainen vetoaa oikeuskansleriin, koska asiassa on rikottu vanhaa lakikirjan oikeus- ja kohtuusperiaatetta.
– Juuri tällaisissa tapauksissa oikeuskanslerin tulisi puuttua peliin.
Ajatus normaalista oikeudesta ja kohtuudesta esitetään jo vanhoissa Ruotsin lain tuomarinohjeissa, jotka yhä on painettu lakikirjan alkuun:
”Se, mikä ei oikeus ja kohtuus ole, ei taida olla lakikaan.”
Tässä on rikottu törkeästi edellä mainittua vanhaa lakikirjan oikeus- ja kohtuusperiaatetta, Vihavainen toteaa.
Vihavainen näkee vaaraksi, että nyky-Suomessa lainkäyttöä alistetaan politiikan palvelukseen.
– On syystä kysytty, miten tällainen on mahdollista ja valvooko kukaan oikeusviranomaisia. Kuten tiedämme, niille on määrätty valvojansa, joka tässä tapauksessa on oikeuskansleri. Kansalla on oikeus odottaa, että hän virkatehtäviensä mukaisesti ilmaisee kantansa myös näissä tapauksissa, hän toteaa.
